اثربخشی آموزش الگوی برنامه‌ریزی درسی مبتنی بر خود نظم‌دهی و پاداش بر کاهش اضطراب امتحان دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش تعیین اثربخشی آموزش الگوی برنامه­ریزی درسی مبتنی بر خود نظم­دهی و پاداش در کاهش اضطراب امتحان دانشجویان بود. روش: روش پژوهش شبه ­آزمایشی با طرح پیش­آزمون، پس­آزمون و جامعه آماری کلیه دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی مراجعه­کننده به مرکز خدمات روان­شناختی و مشاوره دانشگاه شهید بهشتی بود. با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری در دسترس از میان آن­ها 32 دانشجو، 16 دختر و 16 پسر بر اساس نتایج مصاحبه تشخیصی و نمره­های پرسش­نامه اضطراب امتحان فریدمن و بنداز-جاکوب (1997) انتخاب و به­صورت تصادفی در گروه­های آزمایش و گواه جایگزین شد. الگوی برنامه­ریزی درسی مبتنی بر خود نظم­دهی و پاداش زیندر و ماتیوس (2005) در قالب شش جلسه مشاوره تحصیلی هفته­ای یک جلسه به­مدت 60 دقیقه در گروه آزمایش اجرا شد. یافته­ها: نتایج نشان داد تفاوت گروه آزمایش در نمره کلی و ترکیب ابعاد سه­گانه اضطراب امتحان در مقایسه با پیش­آزمون و گروه گواه معنی­دار، و اثرپذیری دو مؤلفه خطای شناختی و تنیدگی به میزان قابل توجهی، بیشتر مربوط به مؤلفه تحقیر اجتماعی است. نتیجه­گیری: برنامه آموزش الگوی برنامه­ریزی درسی مبتنی بر خود نظم­دهی و پاداش روش مؤثری است که از طریق اصلاح و کنترل خطای شناختی و تنیدگی دانشجویان تا حد قابل­توجهی سطح اضطراب امتحان دانشجویان را کاهش می­دهد. کلیدواژه­ها: اضطراب امتحان، برنامه­ریزی درسی، پاداش، خود نظم­دهی.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of a curriculum planning pattern training based on self-regulation and reward to reduce test anxiety in university students

چکیده [English]

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a curriculum planning pattern training based on self-regulation and reward to reduce test anxiety in university students. Method: Research method was a quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design and a population of all undergraduate students admitted to the center of counseling and psychological service center at the Shahid Beheshti University. Using sampling of those available, 32 Student 16 girls and 16 boys was selected regarding the results of diagnostic interview and Friedman and Bendas-Jacob test anxiety questionnaire (1997) and were placed in control and experimental groups randomly. The curriculum planning pattern based on self-regulation and reward introduced by Zeidner and Matthews (2005) was performed for the experimental group in six weekly 45 to 60 minutes sessions of educational counseling. Results: The findings showed that the differences of the experimental group in the total scores and combining the three dimensions of anxiety was significant compared to the pretest and control group, and the taking effect of two component of cognitive obstruction and tenseness are more related to the component of social derogation substantially. Conclusion: The curriculum planning pattern based on self-regulation and reward is an effective way to reduce students' anxiety levels through correction and control of their cognitive obstruction and tenseness.


Keywords: curriculum planning, reward, self-regulation, test anxiety

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • curriculum planning
  • reward
  • self-regulation
  • test anxiety
  1. ابوالقاسمی، عباس.، گل‌پور، محسن.، و نریمانی، محمد. (1386). اثربخشی دو روش بازسازی‌شناختی و آموزش کنترل توجه بر اصلاح باورهای فراشناختی دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به اضطراب امتحان. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 3 (1): 23-10.
  2. باعزت، فرشته.، صادقی، منصوره‌سادات.، ایزدی‌فرد، راضیه.، و روبن‌زاده، شرمین. (1390). اعتباریابی و رواسازی آزمون اضطراب امتحان فریدمن: فرم فارسی. فصلنامه مطالعات روان‌شناختی، 8 (1): 66-51.
  3. پاشایی، زهره.، پورابراهیم، تقی.، و خوش‌کنش، ابوالقاسم. (1388). تأثیر آموزش مهارت‌های مقابله‌ای با هیجان‌ها در اضطراب امتحان و عملکرد تحصیلی دختران دبیرستانی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 4 (12): 20-7.
  4. مهرابی‌زاده هنرمند، مهناز.، و کاظمیان مقدم، کبری. (1386). بررسی اثربخشی روش حساسیت‌زدایی منظم بر اضطراب امتحان و عملکرد تحصیلی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 2 (5): 34-23.
  5. Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives on Motivation: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 69– 164). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  6. Brown, L. A., Forman, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Hoffman, K. L., Yuen, E. K., & Goetter, E. M. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of acceptance-based behavior therapy and cognitive therapy for test anxiety: A pilot study. Behavior Modification, 35 (1): 31-53.
  7. Chamberlain, S., Daly, A. L., & Spalding, V. (2011). The fear factor: Students’ experiences of test anxiety when taking A-level examinations. Pastoral Care in Education, 29 (3): 193- 205.
  8. Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (2): 268- 274.
  9. Croyle, K. L., Weimer, A. A., & Eisenman, R. (2012). Context of assessment changes relationships between test anxiety and related variables. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17(1): 11– 20.
  10. Daly, A. L., Chamberlain, S. & Spalding, V. (2011). Test anxiety, heart rate and performance in A-level French speaking mock exams: An exploratory study. Educational Research, 53 (3): 321– 330.
  11. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs. Educational Research Review, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev 2008.02.003.
  12. EeLynn, N. & Kerry, L. (2010). Children’s task performance under stress and non-stress conditions: A test of the processing efficiency theory, Cognition and Emotion, 24 (7): 1229- 1238
  13. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628- 644.
  14. Ergene, T. (2002) Effective intervention of test anxiety reduction. School psychology, 24, 313- 328.
  15. Eum, K., & Rice, K. G. (2011). Test anxiety, perfectionism, goal orientation, and academic performance. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 24 (2): 167- 178.
  16. Friedman, I. & Bendas-Jacob, O. (1997). Measuring perceived test anxiety in adolescents: A self-report scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 1035- 1046.
  17. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.
  18. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007).The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81– 112.
  19. Karabenick, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  20. Karatas, H., Alci, B., & Aydin, H. (2013). Correlation among high school senior students’ test anxiety, academic performance and points of university entrance exam. Educational Research and Reviews, 8 (13): 919- 926.
  21. Lowe, P. A., & Ang, R. P. (2012). Cross-cultural examination of test anxiety among US and Singapore students on the Test Anxiety Scale for Elementary Students (TAS-E). Educational Psychology, 32 (1): 107- 26.
  22. Newman, R. S. (2007). The motivational role of adaptive help seeking in self-regulated learning. InD. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 315– 338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  23. Oktedalen, T. & Hagtvet, K. A. (2011). A Revised Version of the Norwegian Adaptation of the Test Anxiety Inventory in a Heterogeneous Population. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55 (5): 475– 487.
  24. Patricia, A. L. & Rebecca, P. A. (2012).Cross-cultural examination of test anxiety among US and Singapore students on the Test Anxiety Scale for Elementary Students (TAS-E). Educational Psychology, 32 (1): 107– 126
  25. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., & Hochstadt, M. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17, 287- 316.
  26. Popko, P. (2004). Differentiation and test anxiety in adolescents. Journal of adolescence, 27, 645- 660.
  27. Ruthig, J. C., Perry, R. P., Hall, N. C., & Hladkyj, S. (2004). Optimism and attribution retraining: Longitudinal effects on academic achievement, test anxiety, and voluntary course withdrawal in college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 709- 730.
  28. Sanghvi, C. (1995). Efficacy of study skills training in managing study habits and test anxiety of high test anxious students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 21 (1): 71- 75.
  29. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929- 938.
  30. Schunk, D. H. & Schwartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18 (3): 337– 354.
  31. Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2007). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  32. Segool, N., Carlson, J., Goforth, A., Von der Embse, N., & Barterian, J. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 489-499.
  33. Von der Embse, N. P., Barterian, J., & Segool, N. (2013). Test anxiety interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review of treatment studies from 2000-2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57- 71.
  34. Von der Embse, N. P., Mata, A. D., Segool, N., & Scott, E. C. (2014) Latent Profile Analyses of Test Anxiety: A Pilot Study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32 (2): 165– 172.
  35. Wren, D. G., & Benson, J. (2004). Measuring test anxiety in children: Scale development and internal construct validation. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17, 227- 240.
  36. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.
  37. Zeidner, M. (2004). Test anxiety. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (Vol.3, pp. 545-556). San Diego: Academic Press.
  38. Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 159-177). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
  39. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Evaluative anxiety. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 141-166). New York: Guilford Press
  40. Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motor skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 69– 84.
  41. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical Background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal,45 (1): 166– 183.
  42. Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2008). Enhancing Self-Reflection and Mathematics Achievement of At-risk Students at an Urban Technical College: A Self-regulated Learning Intervention. A final report submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education, through Grant R305H060018 to the City University of New York.