رابطة کنترل‌گری اجبارگونه با رضایت زناشویی و دلزدگی در همسران با استفاده از مدل وابستگی متقابل عامل-شریک

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی خانواده، پژوهشکده خانواده، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، پژوهشکده خانواده، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی رابطة کنترل­گری اجبارگونه با رضایت زناشویی و دلزدگی در همسران بود که باتوجه به ماهیت سؤالات و اهداف، از روش وابستگی متقابل عامل- شریک بهره گرفته شد.
 
روش: طرح پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی و همبستگی است. گروه نمونه شامل تمام زوجین ساکن در ایران بود که به فضای مجازی دسترسی داشتند. درنهایت ۱۱۳ زوج (۲۲۶ زن و شوهر) در سال ۱۴۰۱ و با روش نمونه­گیری آنلاین و دردسترس انتخاب شدند. در این پژوهش مقیاس رفتار­های کنترل­گرایانه (کوان و آرچر، ۲۰۰۵)، مقیاس رضایت زناشویی انریچ (۳۵ سؤالی اولسون و فاورز، ۱۹۹۳) و مقیاس دلزدگی زناشویی (پاینز، ۱۹۹۶) مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. به منظور ارزیابی اثرات بین ­فردی و رابطه­‌ای زوجین، تحلیل داده­‌ها با مدل وابستگی متقابل عامل- شریک انجام شد.
 
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان دادند که اقدام به کنترل­گری اجبارگونه در شوهران، پیش‌­بینی­ کنندة رضایت و دلزدگی زناشویی در خود فرد و همسرانشان بود اما در زنان تنها پیش‌­بینی­ کنندة دلزدگی زناشویی در خود فرد بود. قربانی کنترل­گری اجبارگونه بودن در زنان پیش‌­بینی­ کنندة رضایت و دلزدگی زناشویی در خود فرد و همسرانشان بود اما در شوهران تنها پیش‌­بینی­ کنندة رضایت و دلزدگی زناشویی خود فرد بود.
 
نتیجه­گیری: یافته­ها حاکی از اهمیت تمرکز بر رفتارهای کنترل­گرایانة اجبارگونه در ارزیابی و درمان مشکلات مربوط به روابط همسران است. پیشنهاد می­شود تا روانشناسان و زوج­درمانگران با درنظر گرفتن تأثیرات کنترل­گری اجبارگونه بر رضایت و دلزدگی زناشویی، مداخلات مناسبی را درجهت بهبود روابط همسران طراحی کرده و به­کار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship Between Coercive Control and Marital Satisfaction and Couple Burnout using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Tahereh Fasdi 1
  • Leili Panaghi 2
  • Mansoureh sadat Sadeghi 2
1 M.A in Psychology- Clinical Family Psychology, Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between coercive control and marital satisfaction and couple burnout, utilizing the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) due to the dyadic nature of the questions and purposes.
 
Method: The research design was descriptive and correlational. The sample group included all couples living in Iran with access to cyberspace. Ultimately, 113 couples (226 wives and husbands) in 2022 were selected through online and convenience sampling methods. The Controlling Behaviors Scale (Graham-Kevan and Archer, 2005), ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale (Olson and Fowers, 1993), and Couple Burnout Scale (Pines, 1996) were employed in this research. Data analysis was conducted using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to measure interpersonal and dyadic effects.
 
Results: The results indicated that coercive control perpetration by husbands was predictive of their own and their partners’ marital satisfaction and burnout. However, in wives, coercive control perpetration was only predictive of their own marital burnout. Coercive control victimization in wives was predictive of their own and their partners’ marital satisfaction and burnout, while in husbands, it was only predictive of their own marital satisfaction and burnout.
 
Conclusion: The findings underscore the significance of addressing coercive controlling behaviors in the evaluation and treatment of couples’ relationship problems. It is recommended that couple therapists and psychologists design and implement appropriate interventions to improve couples’ relationships, taking into account the effects of coercive control on marital satisfaction and burnout.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM)
  • Coercive Control
  • Couple Burnout
  • Marital Satisfaction

مراجع

Ackerman, R. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2016). APIMPowerR: An interactive tool for actor-partner interdependence model power analysis. Computer software]. https://robert-a-ackerman. shinyapps. io/APIMPowerRdis. [link]
Ali, P. A., Dhingra, K., & McGarry, J. (2016). A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications. Aggression and violent behavior, 31, 16-25. [link]
Aman, J., Abbas, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The relationship of religiosity and marital satisfaction: The role of religious commitment and practices on marital satisfaction among Pakistani respondents. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 30. [link]
Baucom, D. H., Fischer, M. S., Corrie, S., Worrell, M., & Boeding, S. E. (2020). Treating relationship distress and psychopathology in couples: A cognitive-behavioural approach. [link]
Bishop, C., & Bettinson, V. (2018). Evidencing domestic violence*, including behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 22(1), 3-29. [link]
Bravo, C. S., & Silva, R. M. H. (2018). La satisfacción marital y el manejo del poder en la pareja: prevención para la salud. Revista argentina de clínica psicológica, 27(1), 72-82. [link]
Breiding, M., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. [link]
Choi, E., & Jung, S. Y. (2021). Marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms among Korean couples with young children: Dyadic autoregressive cross‐lagged modeling. Family Relations, 70(5), 1384-1398. [link]
Faraji, J., Namvar, H., & Namvar, B. (2021). Investigating the Factors Affecting Marital Burnout of Couples in Tehran. [link]
Ghazizadeh, H., Zahrakar, K., Kiamanesh, A., & Mohsenzadeh, F. (2018). Conceptual model of underlying factors in women domestic violence against men. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 6(4), 35-48. [link]
Gou, L. H., Duerksen, K. N., & Woodin, E. M. (2019). Coercive control during the transition to parenthood: An overlooked factor in intimate partner violence and family wellbeing?. Aggressive behavior, 45(2), 139-150. [link]
Hamberger, L. K., Larsen, S. E., & Lehrner, A. (2017). Coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 1-11. [link]
Hammett, J. F., Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2021). Intimate partner aggression and marital satisfaction: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(3-4), NP1463-1481NP. [link]
Hardesty, J. L., Crossman, K. A., Haselschwerdt, M. L., Raffaelli, M., Ogolsky, B. G., & Johnson, M. P. (2015). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833-843. [link]
Jibeen, T. (2019). Influence of acculturative stress on marital satisfaction: Moderation effect of gender role and communication styles in Pakistani immigrants. Community Development, 1-21. [link]
Jud, A., Grafe, B., Meshkova, K., Kavemann, B., Meysen, T., Hoffmann, U., Ziegenhain, U., & Fegert, J. (2022). Prevalence and predictors of affirmations of intimate partner violence in Germany: a first nationwide study on victimization in women and men. Journal of interpersonal violence, 08862605221092066. [link]
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications. [link]
Koutsimani, P., Montgomery, A., & Georganta, K. (2019). The Relationship Between Burnout, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 284. [link]
Lövestad, S., Löve, J., Vaez, M., & Krantz, G. (2017). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its association with symptoms of depression; a cross-sectional study based on a female population sample in Sweden. BMC public health, 17(1), 1-11. [link]
Mirzaee Jahed, A., & Saberi, H. (2019). The prediction of marital disaffection of women based on their sexual attitudes and their husbands’ tendency toward dark personality. Q Appl Psychol, 13(3), 371-89. [link]
Moblian, A., Dayarian, M., & Yousefi, Z. (2021). Prediction of Marital Relationship Quality based on Personality Factors, Glasser's basic Needs and Self-Acceptance. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 15 (4): 207, 232, 2. [link]
Moghadasali, S., Mirhashemi, M., & Bagheri, N. (2021). The role communication patterns and identity styles on prediction marital satisfaction: A discriminational study. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 15 (1): 141, 168, 2. [link]
Mortezaei, N., & Rezazade, S. M. R. (2021). The Mediating Role of Marital Commitment in The Relationship Between Equity and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 11(4), 281-292. [link]
Nurhayati, S. R., Faturochman, F., & Helmi, A. F. (2019). Marital quality: A conceptual review. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 109-124. [link]
Pamuk, M., & Durmuş, E. (2015). Investigation of burnout in marriage. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 162–177. [link]
Rada, C. (2020). Violence, communication, and satisfaction among middle-aged adults and older people from Romania. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1-12. [link]
Rajaei Ghazilou, D., Shariatmadar, A., & Farrokhi, N. (2021). Life Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction Based on Lived Experiences of Working and Housewives: A phenomenological Study. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 15 (1): 95, 115, 2. [link]
Rajaei Ghazilou, D., Shariatmadar, A., & Farrokhi, N. (2021). Life Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction Based on Lived Experiences of Working and Housewives: A phenomenological Study. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 15 (1): 95, 115, 2. [link]
Saffari, M., Arslan, S. A., Yekaninejad, M. S., Pakpour, A. H., Zaben, F. A., & Koenig, H. G. (2017). Factors associated with domestic violence against women in Iran: An exploratory multicenter community-based study. Journal of interpersonal violence, 0886260517713224. [link]
Scott, H. S. (2018). Extending the Duluth model to workplace bullying: A modification and adaptation of the workplace power-control wheel. Workplace health & safety, 66(9), 444-452. [link]
Sirin, H. D., & Deniz, M. (2016). The Effect of the Family Training Program on Married Women's Couple-Burnout Levels. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(5), 1563-1585. [link]
Sleath, E., Walker, K., & Tramontano, C. (2018). Factor structure and validation of the controlling behaviors scale–revised and revised conflict tactics scale. Journal of Family Issues, 39(7), 1880-190. [link]
Smaeeli Far, N., Jayervand, H. A., Rasoli, M., & HASANI, J. (2019). A Grounded-Theory Study of the Underlying Factors of Couple Burnout. Women Studies, 10(27), 25-51. [link]
Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence against women, 25(1), 81-104. [link]
Stas, L., Kenny, D. A., Mayer, A., & Loeys, T. (2018). Giving dyadic data analysis away: A user‐friendly app for actor–partner interdependence models. Personal Relationships, 25(1). [link]
World Health Organization. (2019). Violence against women: intimate partner and sexual violence against women: evidence brief (No. WHO/RHR/19.16). World Health Organization. [link]
zare baghbidi, M., etemadifard, A. (2020). Determining the Mediating Role of Communication Skills in the Relationship between alexithymia and marital burnout of divorce client Couples in Yazd. Quarterly Social Psychology Research, 10(38), 135-150. [link]

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار