الگوی ساختاری کمال‌گرایی، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی و سازگاری زناشویی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش تعیین الگوی ساختاری کمال‌گرایی، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی و سازگاری زناشویی بود. روش: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و جامعه آماری تمام ساکنین شهر کرج به‌تعداد ۱۶۱۴۶۲۶ نفر در سال 1393 بود. نمونه‌برداری در دو مرحله انجام شد. در مرحله اول به­روش نمونه‌برداری چندمرحله‌ای منطقه‌های 2، 3، 5، 7 و 10، و در مرحله دوم به‌شکل تصادفی، 5 مرکز از هر منطقه از بین مراکز تفریحی و فرهنگی و سپس بر اساس پیشنهاد گاداگنولی و ولیسر (1998) در مورد حجم نمونه در پژوهش‌های الگویابی معادله‌های ساختاری، از هر مرکز 20 نفر به‌شکل داوطلبانه، و درنهایت 500 زن و مرد متأهل انتخاب شد. ابزارهای پژوهش مقیاس چندبُعدی کمال‌گرایی فراست، مارتن، لاهارت و روزنبلیت (1990)، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی ریف (1989) و سازگاری زناشویی اِسپانیر (1976) بود. داده‌های 405 نفر پس از حذف 90 پرسشنامه مخدوش و 5 آزمودنی پرت از روند پژوهش با استفاده از روش الگویابی معادله‌های ساختاری تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد بهزیستی روان‌شناختی رابطه بین معیارهای فردی (229/0=β، ۰۰۱/۰=P)، سازماندهی (064/0=β، ۰۴۷/۰=P)، نگرانی در مورد اشتباه‌ها (212/0-=β، ۰۰۱/۰=P)، تردید نسبت به اعمال (212/0-=β، ۰۰۱/۰=P)، انتقادگری والدین (257/0-=β، ۰۰۱/۰=P) و انتظارهای والدین (141/0=β، ۰۰۱/۰=P) را با سازگاری زناشویی میانجی‌گری می‌کند. نتیجه‌گیری: از آنجا که بهزیستی روان‌شناختی پایین زوج­ها می‌تواند احتمال ناسازگاری در زندگی زناشویی را افزایش دهد، پیشنهاد می‌شود، در مشاوره­های پیش از ازدواج و در زوج درمانی برای تداوم ازدواج به‌ویژه برای زوج­های که علاوه بر نارضایتی و ناسازگاری‌های زناشویی، دارای بهزیستی روان‌شناختی پایین نیز هستند، بر کمال‌گرایی مثبت و منفی و بهزیستی روان‌شناختی آن­ها توجه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural model of perfectionism, psychological well-being and marital adjustment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razie Nazari
  • Ahmad Karbalaie Mohammad Meigooni
Student in Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University
چکیده [English]

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine structural model of perfectionism, psychological well-being, and marital adjustment. Method: Method was descriptive correlational and the statistical population included all residents of Karaj City (N=1614626) in 2014. Sampling was done in two stages. Through multistage sampling in the first stage 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 regions and in the second stage five centers in every region were selected randomly from sports and cultural centers and then based on Guadagnoli & Velicer (1998) proposal about sample size in structural equation modeling, 20 people in every center volunteered and finally 500 married people (250 couples) were selected. Research tools were Frost, Marten, Lahart & Rosenblate’s (1990) Multiple Perfectionism Scale, Ryff’s (1989) Psychological Well-Being Scale and Spanier’s (1976) Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The data for 405 participants after exclusion of 90 distorted questionnaires and removal of five outliers from the research process, was analyzed by structural equation modeling. Results: Results showed that psychological well-being mediates the relationship between personal standards (β= 0.229, P= 0.001), organization (β= 0.064, P= 0.047), concern over mistakes (β= -0.212, P= 0.001), doubts about actions (β= -0.212, P= 0.001), parental criticism (β= -0.257, P= 0.001), parental expectations (β=0.141, P=0.001) with marital adjustment. Conclusion: Since, low psychological well-being of couples can increase the likelihood of marital maladjustment, it is recommended that, in pre-marriage counseling and in couple therapy, to permanence of marriage specially for couples who in addition to dissatisfaction and marital conflicts, have low psychological well-being too, positive and negative perfectionism and psychological well-being of them be considered.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Adjustment
  • marital
  • perfectionism
  • psychological
  • well-being

مراجع

  1. Cheraghali Gol, H., Rostami, A. M., & Goudarzi, M. (2013). Prediction of marital satisfaction based on perfectionism. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89(1): 567-571.
  2. Dagley, K. C., Sandberg, J. G., Busby, D. M., & Larson, J. H. (2012). Coming to terms, depression, and relationship satisfaction for ative Americans in intimate relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34(4): 481-494.
  3. Foran, H. M., Vivian, D., O’Leary, K. D., Klein, D. N., Rothbaum, B. O., Manber, R., Keller, M. B., Kocsis, J. H., Thase, M. E., & Trivedi, M. H. (2012). Risk for partner victimization and marital dissatisfaction among chronically depressed patients. Journal of Family Violence, 7(3): 75-85.
  4. Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(1): 449-468.
  5. Geranmayepour, S., & Besharat, M. A. (2010). Perfectionism and mental health. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(2): 643-647.
  6. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1998). Relation to sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2): 265-275.
  7. Heizomi, H., Allahverdipour, H., Asghari Jafarabadi, M., & Safaian, A. (2015). Happiness and its relation to psychological well-being of adolescents. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 4(4): 55-60.
  8. Javanmard, G. H., & Mohammadi Garegozlob, R. (2013). The study of relationship between marital satisfaction and personality characteristics in Iranian families. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(1): 396-399.
  9. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, edition 2, Guilford press: New York & London.
  10. Macedo, A., Marques, M., & Pereira, A. T. (2014). Perfectionism and psychological distress: a review of the cognitive factors. Clinical Neurosciences Mental Health, 1(6): 1-10.
  11. Montesino, M. L. C., Gomez, J. L. G., Fernandez, M. E. P., & Rodriguez, J. M. A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) in a community sample of couples. Psicothema, 25(4): 536-541.
  12. Ozden, M. S., & Celen, N. (2014). The relationship between inherent and acquired characteristics of human development with marital adjustment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25(4): 48-56.
  13. Park, H. J., & Jeong, D. Y. (2015). Psychological well-being, life satisfaction, and self-esteem among adaptive perfectionists, maladaptive perfectionists, and nonperfectionists. Personality and Individual Differences, 72(1):165-170.
  14. Perez-Garin, D., Molero, F., & Bos, A. E. R. (2015). Internalized mental illness stigma and subjective well-being: The mediating role of psychological well-being. Psychiatry Research, 228(3): 325-331.
  15. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1): 35-55.
  16. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1): 10-28.
  17. Shaker, R., Heshmati, R., & Poor Rahimi, M. (2010). Investigation of marital adjustment in people with secure, preoccupied, dismissing and fearful attachment styles. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(1): 1823-1826.
  18. Sironic, A., & Reeve, R. A. (2015). A combined analysis of the frost multidimensional perfectionism scale (FMPS), child and adolescent perfectionism scale (CAPS), and almost perfect scale-revised (APS-R): Different perfectionist profiles in adolescent high school students. Psychological Assessment, 27(4): 1471-1483.
  19. Soleimani, A. A., Najafi, M., Ahmadi, K., Javidi, N., Hoseini Kamkar, E., & Mahboubi, M. (2015). The effectiveness of emotionally focused couples’s therapy on sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment of infertile couples with marital conflicts. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 9(3): 393-402.
  20. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scale for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(2): 15-28.
  21. Stoeber, J. (2012). Dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships: Predicting relationship satisfaction and long term commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3): 300-305.
  22. Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1): 295-319.
  23. Stoeber, J., & Stoeber, F. S. (2009). Domains of perfectionism: Prevalence and relationships with perfectionism, gender, age and satisfaction with life. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4): 530-535.
  24. Suh, H., Gnilka, P. B., & Rice, K. G. (2017). Perfectionism and well-being: A positive psychology framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(1): 25-30.
  25. Taylor, E. P., Couper, R., & Butler, C. M. (2017). Adolescent perfectionism: Structural features of the frost multidimensional perfectionism scale and correlates with attachment and psychopathology. Psychology and psychotherapy, 67(1): 49-77
  26. Tigari, A., Asgharnejad, A., Bayannejad, S. A., & Abdin, A. (2006). Contrasting emotion intelligence and marital satisfaction and their contribution to maladjustment coupels and adjustable once in Sari city. (Persian). Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Science, 16(55):78-86.
  27. Turashvilia, T., & Turashvili, M. (2015). Structural equation model of psychological well-being, a Georgian exploration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190(1): 4-9.
  28. Whisman, M. A., & Baucom, D. H. (2012). Intimate relationships & psychopathology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(3): 4-13.
  29. Whisman, M. A., Rhee, S. H., Hink, L., Boeldt, D. L., & Johnson, D. P. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on the association between subjective well-being and marital adjustment. Couple & family psychology, 3(1): 48-64.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار