مقایسه ویژگی شخصیتی و سبک دلبستگی و رفتار پرخطردرنوجوانان عادی و دارای اختلال سلوک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه مشاوره، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران.

2 استاد‌یارگروه مشاوره، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ابهر، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر، مقایسه ویژگی ­های شخصیتی، سبک­ دلبستگی و رفتارهای پرخطر نوجوانان دارای اختلال سلوک و عادی بود. روش: مطالعه توصیفی از نوع پس­رویدادی و جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل تمام نوجوانان پسر دارای اختلال سلوک و عادی در کانون اصلاح و تربیت شهر قم در نیمه دوم سال 1399 بود، که از میان آن ها 70 نفر(35 نفر نوجوان اختلال سلوک و 35 نفر نوجوان عادی) با روش نمونه­‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. در مطالعه حاضر داده ها از طریق پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی فرم کوتاه 60 سوالی(NEO-FFI)، پرسشنامه سبک های­‌دلبستگی 18ماده‌­ای کولینز و رید (1990) و پرسشنامه رفتارهای پرخطر 11سؤالی شجاعی باغینی (1387) جمع‌­آوری و با استفاده از واریانس آزمون تحلیل چند متغیره و آزمون تی­دو نمونه ای مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت و به وسیله نسخه 24 نرم افزار SPSS انجام گردید.یافته‌­ها: نتایج نشان داد که از منابع با استفاده از فن آماری تحلیل واریانس چند متغیرنشان می دهد که 5مولفه ویژگی­ شخصیتی در نوجوانان سلوک و عادی با یکدیگر متفاوت است؛ دست کم در مولفة دلبستگی‌­ناایمن بین دو گروه تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد. و همچنین نتایج تحلیل آزمون تی­زوجی نشان داد که در شرایط پیش‌­فرض برابری واریانس­‌ها در نوجوانان دارای اختلال سلوک و عادی در متغیر رفتارهای پرخطر تفاوت معناداری با یکدیگر دارند­. نتیجه گیری: بر این اساس نتایج پژوهش حاضر را می­توان در افراد دارای اختلال سلوک و بزهکاران به کار برد و به کاهش بروز رفتارهای پر خطر در آنان کمک کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of personality traits and attachment style and high-risk behavior in normal adolescents with conduct disorder

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Johari 1
  • Fateme Alijani 2
1 Department of Counseling, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
2 Department of counseling, Abhar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study is to compare the personality traits, dependence types and high-risk behaviors of teen boys with normal and conduct disorders. Method: A post-event type descriptive study was conducted. The statistical population of this study included all male teens with conduct disorder. Among them 70 were selected by simple random selection in late 2020 (35 with normal conduct disorder from the training center of Qom and 35 normal teens). The questionnaire was done through the 60-item Short Form Revised NEO Personality Inventory Traits Questionnaire (NEO-FFI), the 18-article Adult Attachment Scale by Collins & Read (1990), and the 11-Question High-Risk Behavior Questionnaire by Shojaei Baghini (2008). They were analyzed using variance of multivariate analysis test and T2 test, performed by version 24 of SPSS software. Results: The results showed that the sources using multivariate analysis of variance statistical technology show that 5 components of personality traits in normal and normal conduct teens are different from each other. At least in the component of insecure attachment there is a significant difference between the two groups. Also, the results of desired t-test analysis showed that under the assumption of equality of variance in the two groups, teens with normal and conduct disorder in high-risk behavioral variables, have significant difference with each other. Conclusion: The results of the present study can be used in people with conduct disorder problems and criminals in order to help them decrease their high-risk behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Conduct disorder
  • high-risk behavior
  • dependence type
  • teens
  • personal traits

مراجع

Ates, S., & Turkcan, A. (2015). Temperament, Attachment Styles and Trait Anger of Parents to Adolescents Diagnosed with Conduct Disorder. European Psychiatry, 30(S1), 1-1.link.
Azimkhani, A. (2010). The construction and standardization of the rating scale for diagnosis of conduct disorder among the students in fifth grade of elementary school in Tehran city, central part of Iran (Teachers’ form). Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 12(47), 83-574. doi:10.22038/JFMH.2010.1039.link
Barikani, A. (2008). High risk behaviors in adolescent students in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 14(2), 192-198.link.
Cheah, Y. K., Lim, H. K., & Kee, C. C. (2019). Personal and family factors associated with high-risk behaviours among adolescents in Malaysia. Journal of pediatric nursing, 48, 92-97.link.
Clifton, J. M. (2018). Screening for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and High-Risk Sexual Behaviors in Utah's Juvenile Justice Population: Results and Implications for Practice. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 32(4.link), 380-374.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(4), 644.link.
Costa, E. C., & Botelheiro, A. A. (2021). The impact of intimate partner violence on psychological well-being: Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and the mediating role of insecure attachment styles. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 5(1), 100151.link.
Evren, C., Dalbudak, E., Ozen, S., & Evren, B. (2017). The relationship of social anxiety disorder symptoms with probable attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Turkish university students; impact of negative affect and personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion. Psychiatry research, 254, 158-163.link.
Fletcher, K., Parker, G., Paterson, A., & Synnott, H. (2013). High-risk behaviour in hypomanic states. Journal of affective disorders, 150(1), 50-56.link.
Ghinea, D., Koenig, J., Parzer, P., Brunner, R., Carli, V., Hoven, C. W., . . . Kaess, M. (2019). Longitudinal development of risk-taking and self-injurious behavior in association with late adolescent borderline personality disorder symptoms. Psychiatry research, 273, 127-133.link.
Jusyte, A., Pfister, R., Gehrer, N., & Schönenberg, M. (2019). Risky business! Behavioral bias and motivational salience of rule-violations in children with conduct disorder. Psychiatry research, 271, 740-746.link.
Kassamali, N., & Rattani, S. A. (2014). Factors that affect attachment between the employed mother and the child, infancy to two years. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 6-15.link.
Krause, J. S., Cao, Y., DiPiro, N. D., & Cuddy, E. (2018). Personality, high-risk behaviors, and elevated risk of unintentional deaths related to drug poisoning among individuals with spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 99(10), 1941-1948.link.
Najmi, B. (2010). Correlation between personality traits of parents and type of behavioral disorders in children. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 12(46), 33.link-522.
Narimani, M., Yosefi, F., & Kazemi, R. (2014). The role of attachment styles and quality of life in predicting psychological well-being in adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 124-142 link.
Oguntayo, R., Faworaja, O. R., Akintunde, K. A., & Anochirim, C. S. (2020). INFLUENCE OF FAMILY TYPE, ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCE AND LOCUS OF CONTROL ON CONDUCT DISORDER AMONG JUVENILES IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS. Practicum Psychologia, 10(1.link).
Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones, J., Camino, G., Russo, D. A., Painter, M., Montejo, A. L., Ochoa, S., . . . Perez, J. (2018). Clinically significant personality traits in individuals at high risk of developing psychosis. Psychiatry research, 261, 498-503.link.
Shchebetenko, S. (2019). Do personality characteristics explain the associations between self-esteem and online social networking behaviour? Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 17-23.link.
Vega, D., Torrubia, R., Marco-Pallarés, J., Soto, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2020). Metacognition of daily self-regulation processes and personality traits in borderline personality disorder. Journal of affective disorders, 267, 243-250.link.
 
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار