تنیدگی شغلی و بهزیستی عاطفی معلمان: آزمون الگوی اثر میانجی گر باورهای خودکارآمدی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ

چکیده

چکیدههدف: هدف مطالعة حاضر آزمون میانجیگری باورهای خودکارآمدی شغلی در رابطه بین تنیدگی شغلیو بهزیستی عاطفی معلمان بود. روش: روش پژوهش همبستگی و جامعه آماری تمامی معلمان مدارس1390 به تعداد 284 نفر بود. با روش نمونهگیری - پسرانه کلیه مقاطع در شهرستان دیواندره در سال 91تصادفی ساده، 250 معلم مرد انتحاب شدند و به نسخة تجدیدنظرشدة فهرست تنیدگی شغلی آسیپو1998 )، نسخة کوتاه مقیاس خودکارآمدی معلم شوارزر، اسچیتزر و دیتنر، ( 1999 ) و مقیاس بهزیستی )عاطفی ونکاتویک، فاکس، اسپکتور و کیلووای ( 2000 ) پاسخ دادند. برای آزمون میانجیگریخودکارآمدی در رابطة بین تنیدگی شغلی و بهزیستی عاطفی از روش الگویابی معادلات ساختاریاستفاده شد. یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد رابطة تنیدگی شغلی با خودکارآمدی شغلی و بهزیستی عاطفیمنفی و رابطة باورهای خودکارآمدی و بهزیستی عاطفی مثبت؛ و باورهای خودکارآمدی میانجیگر رابطةتنیدگی شغلی و بهزیستی عاطفی معلمان است. در الگوی مفروض تمامی وزنهای رگرسیونی از لحاظآماری معنیدار بود و متغیرهای پیشبین 64 % از پراکندگی بهزیستی عاطفی را تبیین کرد. نتیجه-گیری: چون بخشی از تمایز در پاسخهای هیجانی معلمان به تجارب شغلی تنیدگیزا، ازطریق تفاوت درمیزان خودکارآمدی آنها قابل تبیین است، میتوان بر ضرروت تقویت باورهای خودکارآمدی در معلمانبهعنوان عاملی ضربهگیر در مواجهه با تجارب شغلی تنیدگیزا تاکید کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. سرمد، زهره.، بازرگان، عباس. و حجازی، الهه. ( 1383 ). روش های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. تهران:
  2. انتشارات آگاه.
  3. Allison, M. G. (2007). Identifying the types of student and teacher behaviors
  4. associated with teacher stress. Teaching and Teacher Education. 23, 624-640.
  5. Badri, M. A., Mohaidat, J., Ferrandino, V., & Mourad, T. E. (2013). The social
  6. cognitive model of job satisfaction among teachers: Testing and validation.
  7. International Journal of Educational Research, 57, 12–24
  8. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and
  9. functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
  10. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied
  11. Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269-290.
  12. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F.
  13. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1e43).
  14. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
  15. Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving not just surviving: A
  16. review of research on teacher resilience. Educational Research Review, 6,
  17. –207.
  18. Chan. D. W. (2002). Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological
  19. distress among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Educational
  20. Psychology, 22 (5), 557 – 569.
  21. Chan, D. W. (2003). Hardiness and its role in the stress–burnout relationship
  22. among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher
  23. Education, 19, 381–395.
  24. Chan, D. W. (2009).The hierarchy of strengths: Their relationships with
  25. subjective well-being among Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and
  26. Teacher Education, 25 (6), 867–875.
  27. Chan, D. W. (2013). Subjective well-being of Hong Kong Chinese teachers: The
  28. contribution of gratitude, forgiveness, and the orientations to happiness.
  29. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 22–30.
  30. Devonport, T. J., & Lane, A. M. (2006). Relationships between self-efficacy,
  31. coping and student retention. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 127–138.
  32. Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013).
  33. Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout,
  34. and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain and Education, 7 (3), 182-195.
  35. Hamama, L., Ronen, T., Shachar, K., & Rosenbaum, M. (2013). Links between
  36. stress, positive and negative affect, and life satisfaction among teachers in
  37. special education schools. Journal Happiness Studies, 14, 731–751.
  38. Hicks, R. E., Fujiwara, D., & Bahr, M. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of
  39. the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised, among Australian teachers. In
  40. Social science methodology conference. University of Sydney: Australian
  41. Consortium for Social and Political Research Inc.
  42. انور نوری، امید شکری و مسعود شریفی
  43. )/ زمستان 1392 ) 72 فصلنامه روان شناسی کاربردی/ سال 7/ شماره 4
  44. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure
  45. analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation
  46. Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  47. Hughes, J. C. (2006). Teacher stress, teacher efficacy, and standardized testing: A
  48. study of New York City public school teachers. Unpublished Dissertation,
  49. University of Fordham.
  50. Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact
  51. of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology,
  52. (3), 349-361.
  53. Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The
  54. mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40,
  55. -1290.
  56. Klassen, R. M., Foster, R. Y., Rajani, S., Bowman, C. (2009). Teaching in the
  57. Yukon: Exploring teachers’ efficacy beliefs, stress, and job satisfaction in a
  58. remote setting. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 381–394.
  59. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2th
  60. Ed.).Guilford Press, New York & London.
  61. Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and
  62. adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 11–21.
  63. Luszczynska, A., Mouamed, N. E., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Self-efficacy and
  64. social support predict benefit finding 12 months after cancer surgery: The
  65. mediating role of coping strategies. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 10,
  66. –375.
  67. McCormick, J., & Ayres, P. L. (2009). Teacher self-efficacy and occupational
  68. stress: A major Australian curriculum reform revisited. Journal of
  69. Educational Administration, 47 (40), 463-476.
  70. Osipow, S. H. (1998). Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R):
  71. Professional Manual. USA- Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  72. Pakenham, K. I., & Bursnall, S. (2006). Relations between social support,
  73. appraisal and coping and both positive and negative outcomes for children of
  74. a parent with multiple sclerosis and comparisons with children of healthy
  75. parents. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 709–723.
  76. Pakenham, K. I., Sofronoff, K., & Samios, C. (2004). Finding meaning in
  77. parenting a child with Asperger syndrome: Correlates of making sense and
  78. benefit finding. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 245–264.
  79. Parker, P. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Liem, G. A. (2012). Teachers’ workplace
  80. well-being: Exploring a process model of goal orientation, coping behavior,
  81. engagement, and burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 503-513.
  82. Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Reducing teacher
  83. burnout: A socio-contextual approach Teaching and Teacher Education.
  84. , 62-72.
  85. Ravichandran, R., & Rajendran, R. (2007). Perceived sources of stress among the
  86. teachers. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 33 (1), 133-
  87. تنیدگی شغلی و بهزیستی عاطفی در معلمان ...
  88. Rigotti, T., Schyns, B., & Mohr, G. (2008). A short version of the occupational
  89. self-efficacy scale: structural and construct validity across five countries.
  90. Journal of Career Assessment, 16 (2), 238–255.
  91. Ross, J. J. (2005). Factor analysis of the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised,
  92. and an investigation into the relationships between occupational stress, time
  93. and job satisfaction among school psychologists. Indiana University of
  94. Pennsylvania.
  95. Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the
  96. stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview.
  97. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 243–252.
  98. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Daytner, G. T. (1999). The Teacher Self-
  99. Efficacy scale [On-line publication]. Available at: http://www.fuberlin.
  100. de/gesund/skalen/t_se.htm.
  101. Serrano, M. A., Moya-Albiol, L., & Salvador, A. (2008). The Role of Gender in
  102. Teachers’ perceived stress and heart rate. Journal of Psychophysiology, 22
  103. (1), 58–64.
  104. Sharplin, E., O’Neill, M., & Chapman, A. (2011). Coping strategies for
  105. adaptation to new teacher appointments: Intervention for retention. Teaching
  106. and Teacher Education, 27, 136e146.
  107. Shen, Y. E. (2009). Relatioships between self-efficacy, social support and stress
  108. coping strategies in Chinese primary and secondary school teacher. Stress
  109. and Health 25, 129–138.
  110. Shernoff, E. S., Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., Torf, R., & Spencer, J. (2011). A
  111. qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among Urban teachers.
  112. School Mental Health, 3, 59–69.
  113. Shirom, A., Oliver, A., & Stein, E. (2009). Teachers’ stressors and strains: A
  114. longitudinal study of their relationships. International Journal of Stress
  115. Management, 16 (4), 312–332.
  116. Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Specter, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the
  117. job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS) to investigate affective
  118. responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5
  119. (2), 219-230.
  120. Veresova, M., & Mala, D. (2012). Stress, Proactive Coping and Self- Efficacy of
  121. Teachers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 294 – 300.
  122. Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in crossnational
  123. perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92-103.
  124. Wei, S., Shujuanb, Z., & Qiboc, H. (2011). Resilience and social support as
  125. moderators of work stress of young teachers in engineering college. Procedia
  126. Engineering, 24, 856 – 860.
  127. Yang, X., Ge, C., Hu, B., Chi, T., & Wang, L. (2009). Relationship between
  128. quality of life and occupational stress among teachers. Public Health, 123,
  129. –755.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار