Self-concept and Regulation of Interpersonal Distance in Close Relationships: A Study with Comfortable Interpersonal Distance Test

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assistant Professor, Departman of Psyhology, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Aim: Physical distance regulation in interpersonal interactions is a key component of the quality of close relationships. This distance is regulated differently in various individuals and psychological states. The aim of this study was the study of comfortable interpersonal distance in individuals with negative and positive self-concept. Method: In this study we compared 47 students with positive self-concept with 47 students with negative self-concept in terms of the comfortable interpersonal distance when facing different protagonists (including mother, love partner, close friend, childhood self-image and current self-image as significant others, as well as salesperson and thief). All participants in both groups completed modified computerized version of the comfortable interpersonal distance (CID) task in both the passive mode (when protagonists approached them) and the active mode (when they approached protagonists). We asked participants to determine the point at which they felt uncomfortable. Results: The results of repeated measures MANOVA showed the negative self-concept group preferred a significantly larger interpersonal distance than the positive self-concept group with all protagonists except the salesperson and thief. Conclusion: The results of this study, while emphasizing the role of self-alienation in regulating interpersonal distance with others, were discussed in the framework of object relations and attachment theories.

Keywords

References

Abdevali, M., Mazaheri, M. A., Besharat, M. A., Zabihzadeh, A., & Green, J. D. (2021). Borderline Personality Disorder and larger comfortable interpersonal distance in close relationships. Personality & Individual Diffrencess. (Inpress). [Link]
Akbarian, H., Mazaheri, M. A., Zabihzadeh, A., & Green, J. D. (2020). Attachment-related anxiety and avoidance and regulation of interpersonal distance in close relationships. Current Psychology, 234, 1-7. [Link]
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY, US: Basic Books. [Link]
Caligor, E., Kernberg, O. F., Clarkin, J. F., & Yeomans, F. E. (2018). Psychodynamic therapy for personality pathology: Treating self and interpersonal functioning. American Psychiatric Pub. [Link]
Duke, M. P., & Nowicki, S. (1972). A new measure and social-learning model for interpersonal distance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6(3), 119–132. [Link]
Fineberg, S. K., Leavitt, J., Landry, C. D., Neustadter, E. S., Lesser, R. E., Stahl, D. S., ... & Corlett, P. R. (2018). Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder show larger preferred social distance in live dyadic interactions. Psychiatry research, 260, 384-390. [Link]
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday. [Link]
Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological bulletin, 94(2), 293-300. [Link]
Kawamoto, T. (2020). The moderating role of attachment style on the relationship between self-concept clarity and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109604. [Link]
Layden, E. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018). Loneliness predicts a preference for larger interpersonal distance within intimate space. PloS one, 13(9), e0203491. [Link]
Lloyd, D. M. (2009). The space between us: A neurophilosophical framework for the investigation of human interpersonal space. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(3), 297-304. [Link]
Maier, A., Gieling, C., Heinen-Ludwig, L., Stefan, V., Schultz, J., Güntürkün, O., ... & Scheele, D. (2020). Association of childhood maltreatment with interpersonal distance and social touch preferences in adulthood. American journal of psychiatry, 177(1), 37-46. [Link]
Nandrino, J. L., Ducro, C., Iachini, T., & Coello, Y. (2017). Perception of peripersonal and interpersonal space in patients with restrictive‐type anorexia. European Eating Disorders Review, 25(3), 179-187. [Link]
Nechamkin, Y., Salganik, I., Modai, I., & Ponizovsky, A. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in schizophrenic patients: relationship to negative syndrome. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 49(3), 166-174. [Link]
Perry, A., Nichiporuk, N., & Knight, R. T. (2016). Where does one stand: a biological account of preferred interpersonal distance. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 11(2), 317-326. [Link]
Rinn, A. N., & Cunningham, L. G. (2008). Using self-concept instruments with Highability college students: reliability and validity evidence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3): 232-242. [Link]
Sawada, Y. (2003). Blood pressure and heart rate responses to an intrusion on personal space. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(2), 115-121. [Link]
Welsch, R., von Castell, C., & Hecht, H. (2020). Interpersonal distance regulation and approach-avoidance reactions are altered in psychopathy. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(2), 211-225. [Link]

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics