مدل یابی روابط ساختاری دوسوگرایی خود و علائم اختلال وسواس فکری-عملی: نقش میانجی تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم‌اطمینان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خیام، مشهد، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خیام، مشهد، ایران.

10.48308/apsy.2024.234687.1613

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی نقش میانجی تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم‌اطمینان در رابطه بین دوسوگرایی خود و شدت علائم وسواسی-اجباری در یک نمونه آنالوگ انجام‌شد. روش: روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل بزرگ‌سالان بالای 18 سال بود که از میان آن‌ها 718 نفر با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان، مقیاس‌های دوسوگرایی خود (بار و کیریوس، 2007)، تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم‌اطمینان 12 موردی (کارلتون و همکاران، 2007) و پرسشنامه وسواسی اجباری ییل-براون (گودمن و همکاران، 1989) را تکمیل کردند. جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزارهای Amos-24 و SPSS-27 استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: بررسی داده­های پژوهش نشان داد که بین دوسوگرایی خود و شدت علائم وسواسی-اجباری رابطه‌ای مثبت و معنادار (01/0P<) و بین تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم ‌اطمینان و دوسوگرایی خود و همچنین شدت علائم وسواسی-اجباری رابطه‌ای منفی و معنادار وجود دارد (01/0P<). همچنین، تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم‌اطمینان رابطه بین دوسوگرایی خود و شدت علائم وسواسی-اجباری را میانجی‌گری کرد (01/0P<). نتیجه‌گیری: بررسی یافته­ها نشان داد که سطوح بالای دوسوگرایی خود با کاهش تحمل­ناپذیری عدم اطمینان، سبب افزایش شدت علایم وسواسی- جبری می­شود. به این صورت که سطوح بالای دوسوگرایی خود، با متمرکز کردن توجه بر خود و کاستن از توجه به محیط، سبب کاهش تحمل‌ناپذیری عدم اطمینان و در نتیجه ظهور علایم وسواسی می­شود. بر این اساس، می‌توان نشانه‌های وسواسی را تلاش فرد جهت حل دوسوگرایی در مورد خود دانست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Relationship Modeling of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Symptoms and self-Ambivalence: The Mediating Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Shahamat Dehsorkh 1
  • seyedeh maryam zamani vosta kolaei 2
1 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of humanities, Khayyam University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Msc, Department of Psychology, Faculty of humanities, Khayyam University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Aim: This study aimed to examine the mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty in the relationship between self-ambivalence and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in an analog sample. Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population of the study included adults over 18 years old, from whom 718 individuals were selected as the research sample using convenience sampling. Participants completed the Ambivalence Scale (Bhar & Kyrios, 2007), the 12-item Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Carleton et al., 2007), and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Goodman et al., 1989). For data analysis, structural equation modeling and the software Amos-24 and SPSS-27 were used. Results: The research findings indicated that there is a significant and positive relationship between self-ambivalence and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (P<0.01), and a significant and negative relationship between intolerance of uncertainty with self-ambivalence and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (P<0.01). Additionally, intolerance of uncertainty mediated the relationship between self-ambivalence and the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (P<0.01). Conclusion: An examination of the findings showed that high levels of self-ambivalence lead to increased intensity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms by reducing tolerance for uncertainty. High levels of self-ambivalence, by focusing attention on oneself and reducing attention to the environment, result in decreased tolerance for uncertainty and consequently the emergence of obsessive symptoms. Based on this, obsessive symptoms can be seen as an individual's attempt to resolve ambivalence about themselves.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intolerance of Uncertainty
  • Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms
  • self-Ambivalence

مراجع

Aardema, F., Moulding, R., Melli, G., Radomsky, A. S., Doron, G., Audet, J. S., & Purcell‐Lalonde, M. (2018). The role of feared possible selves in obsessive–compulsive and related disorders: A comparative analysis of a core cognitive self‐construct in clinical samples. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 25(1), e19-e29.[Link]
Aardema, F., Wong, S. F., Audet, J. S., Melli, G., & Baraby, L. P. (2019). Reduced fear‐of‐self is associated with improvement in concerns related to repugnant obsessions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 327-341.[Link]
Ahern, C. Kyrios, M. & Moulding, R. (2015). Self-based concepts and obsessive-compulsive phenomena. Psychopathology, 48(5), 287-292.[Link]
Ahern, C. T. (2012). The role of self-construals in obsessive-compulsive disorder (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology).
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Bhar, S. S. Kyrios, M. & Hordern, C. (2015). Self-ambivalence in the cognitive-behavioural treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychopathology, 48(5), 349-356.[Link]
Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of anxiety disorders, 21(1), 105-117.[Link]
Coles, M. E., Schubert, J., Stewart, E., Sharkey, K. M., & Deak, M. (2020). Sleep duration and timing in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): evidence for circadian phase delay. Sleep Medicine, 72, 111-117.[Link]
Dadfarnia, S., & Moosavian, E. (2020). The Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Self-Ambivalence Measure about Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(3), 35-46. doi: 10.22075/jcp.2020.18238.1702 [Link]
Fawcett, E. J., Power, H., & Fawcett, J. M. (2020). Women are at greater risk of OCD than men: a meta-analytic review of OCD prevalence worldwide. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 81(4), 13075.[Link]
Fernandez, S. J., Daffern, M., Moulding, R., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2023). Exploring predictors of aggressive intrusive thoughts and aggressive scripts: Similarities and differences in phenomenology. Aggressive behavior, 49(2), 141-153.[Link]
Foster, J. D., Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2007). Linking adult attachment to self-esteem stability. Self and Identity, 6(1), 64-73.[Link]
 Godwin, T. L., Godwin, H. J., & Simonds, L. M. (2020). What is the relationship between fear of self, self‐ambivalence, and obsessive–compulsive symptomatology? A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(6), 887-901.[Link]
Goodman, W. K. Price, L. H. Rasmussen, S. A. Mazure, C. Delgado, P. Heninger, G. R. & Charney, D. S. (1989). The yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale: II. Validity. Archives of general psychiatry, 46(11), 1012-1016.[Link]
Guilford publications. [Link]
Ingram, R. E. (1990). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: review and a conceptual model. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 156.[Link]
Klein, R. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed). Guilford Press.[Link]
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.[Link]
Knowles, K. A., & Olatunji, B. O. (2023). Intolerance of uncertainty as a cognitive vulnerability for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A qualitative review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.[Link]
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207.[Link]
Kyrios, M., Moulding, R., Doron, G., Bhar, S. S., Nedeljkovic, M., & Mikulincer, M. (Eds) (2016). The self in understanding and treating psychological disorders. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Llorens‐Aguilar, S., Arnáez, S., Aardema, F., & García‐Soriano, G. (2022). The relationship between obsessions and the self: Feared and actual self‐descriptions in a clinical obsessive–compulsive disorder sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(2), 642-651.[Link]
Marqueses JM, Fausor R, Sanz-García A, García-Vera MP, Sanz J. Validity Evidence for the Self-Absorption Scale (SAS) in Spanish Population. Psicothema. 2024 Ene;36(1):64-71.  [Link]
Moore, A., Wheaton, M. G., Rodriguez, C. I., Raila, H., & Shen, H. (2023). Compulsively seeking certainty: Clarifying the association between intolerance of uncertainty and compulsion severity in OCD. Journal of emotion and psychopathology, 1(1), 262-272.[Link]
Özekin Üncüer, F. (2015). Perceived parenting styles, self-ambivalence, cognitive and emotional regulation in relation to obsessive-compulsive symptomatology.[Link]
Ruscio, A. M., Stein, D. J., Chiu, W. T., & Kessler, R. C. (2010). The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular psychiatry, 15(1), 53-63.[Link]
Seah, R. Fassnacht, D. & Kyrios, M. (2018). Attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence as vulnerabilities toward Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 18, 40-46.[Link]
Sookman, D., Phillips, K. A., Anholt, G. E., Bhar, S., Bream, V., Challacombe, F. L., ... & Veale, D. (2021). Knowledge and competency standards for specialized cognitive behavior therapy for adult obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry research, 303, 113752.[Link]
Stein, Dan J., Daniel LC Costa, Christine Lochner, Euripedes C. Miguel, YC Janardhan Reddy, Roseli G. Shavitt, Odile A. van den Heuvel, and H. Blair Simpson. "Obsessive–compulsive disorder." Nature reviews Disease primers 5, no. 1 (2019): 52.[Link]
Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2012). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre -service teachers: a multi -group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, Interactive Learning Environments , 22(1), 1 -16. [Link]
Veale, D., & Roberts, A. (2014). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. BMJ, 2183(April), 1–6.[Link]
 Xu, J., Ironside, M. L., Broos, H. C., Johnson, S. L., & Timpano, K. R. (2024). Urged to feel certain again: The role of emotion‐related impulsivity on the relationships between intolerance of uncertainty and OCD symptom severity. British Journal of Clinical Psychology.[Link]
Yorulmaz, O., GÜNGÖR CULHA, D. U. Y. G. U., & Gokdag, C. (2019). The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire: Adaptation of its short forms to the Turkish and examination of their psychometric properties. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 30(3).[Link]
Zahrayi, Tahere, YOUSEFI, FAYEGH, & SAED, OMID. (2019). Psychometric properties of instruments for assessing intolerance of uncertainty: A Review Study. SHENAKHT JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 6(2 ), 116-133. [Link]
فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 31 تیر 1403

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار