ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه اعتماد، بی‌اعتمادی و ساده‌لوحی معرفتی (ETMCQ) در جامعة ایرانی

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی و سلامت، دانشکده‌ علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی و سلامت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی اجتماعی و فرهنگی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی تحولی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

5 دانشیار روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، تربیتی و سلامت، دانشکده علوم مغز، کالج دانشگاهی لندن، انگلستان.

10.48308/apsy.2024.233137.1570

چکیده

هدف: هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی ساختار عاملی، روایی و پایایی پرسشنامة اعتماد، بی‌اعتمادی و ساده‌لوحی معرفتی (ETMCQ) در جامعة ایرانی بود.
 
روش: پژوهش حاضر، به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ شیوة گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش را کلّیة زنان و مردان ایرانی بالای 18 سال در سال 1401 تشکیل می‌دادند. پس از ترجمه و تأیید روایی صوری و محتوایی پرسشنامه توسّط اهل فن، 690 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شده و به نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة اعتماد، بی‌اعتمادی و ساده‌لوحی معرفتی پاسخ دادند. روایی عاملی این مقیاس با روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و همسانی درونی آن بر اساس ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به دست آمد. برای بررسی روایی هم‌گرا و واگرا نیز از پرسشنامة تجارب روابط نزدیک (ECR)، مقیاس ذهنی‌سازی (MentS)، سیاهة سازمان شخصیّت (IPO) و پرسشنامة ترومای کودکی (CTQ) استفاده شد.
 
یافته‌ها: نتایج، حاکی از برازش مطلوب مدل سه عاملی پرسشنامه در نمونة ایرانی بود. مقادیر ضرایب همسانی درونی برای خرده‌مقیاس‌های اعتماد معرفتی، بی‌اعتمادی معرفتی و ساده‌لوحی معرفتی به ترتیب برابر با 66/0، 56/0 و 79/0 محاسبه شد. همچنین، روایی ملاکی، هم‌گرا و واگرای ابزار نیز مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.
 
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر، نشان‌دهندة ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مطلوب نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة اعتماد، بی‌اعتمادی و ساده‌لوحی معرفتی بود. لذا پرسشنامة فوق را می‌توان ابزاری مناسب برای سنجش موضع معرفتی بزرگسالان در زمینه‌های تحقیقاتی مختلف به حساب آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometrics Properties of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) in Iranian Society

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Amini 1
  • Mohammad Ali Mazaheri 2
  • Abbas Zabihzadeh 3
  • Omid Shokri 4
  • Chloe Campbell 5
1 M.A in Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Psychology at the Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant professor, Department of Social and Cultural Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Developmental Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran.
5 Associate professor, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
چکیده [English]

Aim: The purpose of this research was to investigate factor structure, validity, and reliability of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) in Iranian Society.
 
Method: The research method was in terms of purpose, applied and the data collection method was descriptive correlational. The statistical population included all Iranian females and males above 18 years old in the year 2022. After translating and obtaining the face validity and the content validity of the questionnaire by experts, 690 adults were selected using convenience sampling and answered the Persian version of the ETMCQ. The factor validity of the ETMCQ, by confirmatory and exploratory analysis methods, and internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha were obtained. Also, to investigate the convergent and divergent validity, The Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire (ECR), The Mentalization Scale (MentS), The Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) were used.
 
Results: The results showed that the three-factor structure of the questionnaire in the Iranian sample had a good fit with the data. Internal consistency for the epistemic trust, epistemic mistrust, and epistemic credulity was 0/66, 0/56, and 0/79, respectively. Also, the construct validity, the convergent validity, and the divergent validity of the instrument were confirmed.
 
Conclusion: The findings of the current research confirmed the psychometric characteristics of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire. Therefore, this questionnaire can be considered a suitable instrument for measuring the epistemic stances of adults in various research fields.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Epistemic Trust
  • Epistemic Mistrust
  • Epistemic Credulity
  • Psychometric Properties

مراجع

Ale Behbahani, Marjan., Mohammadi, Nourollah. (2007). Examining the psychometric properties of the Kernberg's the Inventory of personality organization. Psychology, No. 42, 197-185. [link]
Allen, J. G. (2018). Mentalizing in the development and treatment of attachment trauma. Routledge. [link]
Amini, Mostafa. (2022). The mediating role of epistemic trust in the relationship between attachment and mentalization with personality organization in adults. Master's thesis, field of clinical psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology. [link]
Bateman, A., Campbell, C., Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2018). A mentalization-based approach to common factors in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Current opinion in psychology, 21, 44-49. [link]
Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child abuse & neglect, 27(2), 169-190. [link]
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. Attachment theory and close relationships, 46, 76. [link]
Butters, J. L. (2016). Learning to Trust, trusting to Treat: Epistemic Trust and Significant Learning Moments for Psychotherapy Trainees in their Own Therapy (Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Psychology). [link]
Campbell, C., Tanzer, M., Saunders, R., Booker, T., Allison, E., Li, E., ... & Fonagy, P. (2021). Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PloS one, 16(4), e0250264. [link]
Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Elliott, L., ... & De Rosnay, M. (2009). Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child development, 80(3), 750-761. [link]
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4), 148-153. [link]
Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., & Jolić Marjanović, Z. (2018). The Mentalization Scale (MentS): A self-report measure for the assessment of mentalizing capacity. Journal of personality assessment, 100(3), 268-280. [link]
Ebrahimi, H., Dejkam, M., Seghatoleslam, T. (2014). Childhood Traumas and Suicide Attempt in adulthood. IJPCP 2014; 19 (4) :275-282. [link]
Egyed, K., Király, I., & Gergely, G. (2013). Communicating shared knowledge in infancy. Psychological science, 24(7), 1348-1353. [link]
Fonagy, P. (2018). Epistemic Trust and Epistemic Injustice, Trying to Understand The Way Psychological Therapies Work For Persistent Mental Health Problems. [link]
Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372. [link]
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Allison, E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of personality disorders, 29(5), 575-609. [link]
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E., & Campbell, C. (2017). What we have changed our minds about: Part 2. Borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust and the developmental significance of social communication. Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 4(1), 1-12. [link]
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Campbell, C., & Allison, L. (2019). Epistemic trust, psychopathology and the great psychotherapy debate. Society for the Advancement of Psychotherapy. [link]
Kampling, H., Kruse, J., Lampe, A., Nolte, T., Hettich, N., Brähler, E., ... & Riedl, D. (2022). Epistemic trust and personality functioning mediate the association between adverse childhood experiences and posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in adulthood. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. [link]
Kernberg, O. F., & Clarkin, J. F. (1995). The inventory of personality organization. White Plains, NY: The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. [link]
Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The inventory of personality organization: psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological assessment, 13(4), 577. [link]
Liotti, M., Milesi, A., Spitoni, G. F., Tanzilli, A., Speranza, A. M., Parolin, L., ... & Giovanardi, G. (2023). Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity questionnaire (ETMCQ). Plos one, 18(1), e0280328. [link]
McCraw, B. W. (2015). The nature of epistemic trust. Social epistemology, 29(4), 413-430. [link]
Orme, W., Bowersox, L., Vanwoerden, S., Fonagy, P., & Sharp, C. (2019). The relation between epistemic trust and borderline pathology in an adolescent inpatient sample. Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 6(1), 1-9. [link]
Panaghi, L., Maleki, G., Zabihzadeh, A., Poshtmashhadi, M., Soltaninezhad, Z. (2014). Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of Experiences in Close Relationship (ECR) Scale. IJPCP 2014; 19 (4) :305-313. [link]
Safari Mousavi, S. S., Sadeghi, M., & Sepahvandi, M. A. (2020). The Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of Mentalization Questionnaire: A Self-Report Measure for the Assessment of Mentalizing Capacity. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 123-134. doi: 10.22108/cbs.2021.127401.1492. [link]
Schröder-Pfeifer, P., Georg, A. K., Talia, A., Volkert, J., Ditzen, B., & Taubner, S. (2022). The Epistemic Trust Assessment—An experimental measure of epistemic trust. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 39(1), 50. [link]
Schroder-Pfeifer, P., Talia, A., Volkert, J., & Taubner, S. (2018). Developing an assessment of epistemic trust: a research protocol. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 21(3). [link]      
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [link]
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359-393. [link]
Talia, A., Duschinsky, R., Mazzarella, D., Hauschild, S., & Taubner, S. (2021). Epistemic Trust and the Emergence of Conduct Problems: Aggression in the Service of Communication. [link]
Tanzer, M., Campbell, C., Saunders, R., Luyten, P., Booker, T., & Fonagy, P. (2021). Acquiring knowledge: Epistemic trust in the age of fake news. [link]
Thomas, N., & Jenkins, H. (2019). The journey from epistemic vigilance to epistemic trust: service-users experiences of a community mentalization-based treatment programme for Anti-Social personality disorder (ASPD). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(6), 909-938. [link]
Wickham, A. L. (2019). The Role of Epistemic Trust in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)). [link]
فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 08 اسفند 1402

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار