Pure Altruistic Punishment: An Event-related Potential Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Psychology

2 professor, Department of psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Dept. of Clinical & Health Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University

4 Institute for Cognitive and Brain Science, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Abstract:
Aim: High levels of cooperation are formed in societies where people who violate certain norms are punished by the punitive behavior of others. The aim of the present study was to discriminate the types of reactions of individuals to unfair offers and to study their electrophysiological components. method: 40 male students of Shahid Beheshti University participated in this study through available sampling and their reaction in the modified form of dictator and ultimatum games was measured and evaluated. Findings: Behavioral findings showed most participants did not accept unfair offers and behaved equally unfairly in DG. The results of the hierarchical clustering analysis showed that groups are divided into four groups based on fair-unfair continuity in both games. The behavior of the first group was in the form of pure altruistic punishment and the other groups included a kind of selfishness and behavioral inconsistency. Electrophysiological data showed that in the first group, the FRN and P300 amplitude were lower than in the other groups. Conclusion: This study deepens our understanding of the foundation of justice as a moral construct by respondents and allows us to assess the processes that exist specifically to evaluate fair and unfair proposals. as far as we know, this study is the first to show the difference between neural data based on event related potential, arising from altruistic punishment, and other forms of punishment, and provide important practical implications for the evolution of collaboration.

Key words: Altruistic Punishment,, Event-related Potential

Keywords

References

Alexopoulos, J., Pfabigan, D. M., Lamm, C., Herbert, B., & Fischmeister, F. P. S. (2012). Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, 59.[link]
Boksem, M. A., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Social neuroscience, 5(1), 118-128.[link]
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179-181.[link]
Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game. Scientific reports, 4(1), 1-4.[link]
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Strategizing in the brain. Science, 300(5626), 1673-1675.[link]
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. (1998). Context updating and the P300. Behavioral and brain sciences, 21(1), 152-154.[link]
Falco, A., Albinet, C., Rattat, A. C., Paul, I., & Fabre, E. (2019). Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 14(2), 141-149.[link]
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137-140.[link]
Gächter, S., & Herrmann, B. (2009). Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1518), 791-806.[link]
Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(5563), 2279-2282.[link]
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and human Behavior, 24(3), 153-172.[link]
Güth, W., & Tietz, R. (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(3), 417-449.[link]
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362-1367.[link]
Hewig, J., Coles, M. G., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., & Miltner, W. H. (2011). Dissociation of Pe and ERN/Ne in the conscious recognition of an error. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1390-1396.[link]
Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., & Miltner, W. H. (2008). An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack. cortex, 44(9), 1197-1205.[link]
Hoeft, L., & Mill, W. (2017). Selfish punishers: An experimental investigation of designated punishment behavior in public goods. Economics Letters, 157, 41-44.[link]
Jensen, K. (2010). Punishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2635-2650.[link]
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. science, 314(5800), 829-832.[link]
Masaki, H., Takeuchi, S., Gehring, W. J., Takasawa, N., & Yamazaki, K. (2006). Affective-motivational influences on feedback-related ERPs in a gambling task. Brain research, 1105(1), 110-121.[link]
Mayer, S. V., Rauss, K., Pourtois, G., Jusyte, A., & Schönenberg, M. (2019). Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 269(6), 731-740.[link]
McClure, S. M., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of neuroscience, 27(21), 5796-5804.[link]
   Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. science, 314(5805), 1560-1563.[link]
Parton, D. M., & Ent, M. R. (2018). Vulnerable narcissism predicts greater spiteful punishment of a third-party transgressor. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 150-153.[link]
Peterburs, J., Voegler, R., Liepelt, R., Schulze, A., Wilhelm, S., Ocklenburg, S., & Straube, T. (2017). Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation. Scientific reports, 7, 44062.[link]
Polezzi, D., Lotto, L., Daum, I., Sartori, G., & Rumiati, R. (2008). Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain. Behavioural brain research, 187(1), 116-122.[link]
Qu, C., Wang, Y., & Huang, Y. (2013). Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 505.[link]
Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2019). Punishment: one tool, many uses. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 1.[link]
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758.[link]
Stallen, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013). The cooperative brain. The Neuroscientist, 19(3), 292-303.[link]
Sun, L., Tan, P., Cheng, Y., Chen, J., & Qu, C. (2015). The effect of altruistic tendency on fairness in third-party punishment. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 820.[link]
Sylwester, K., Herrmann, B., & Bryson, J. J. (2013). Homo homini lupus? Explaining antisocial punishment. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 6(3), 167.[link]
Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of economic perspectives, 2(4), 195-206.[link]
Utku, H., Erzengin, Ö. U., Cakmak, E. D., & Karakaş, S. (2002). Discrimination of brain's neuroelectric responses by a decision-making function. Journal of neuroscience methods, 114(1), 25-31.[link]
Van der Veen, F. M., & Sahibdin, P. P. (2011). Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(4), 516-525.[link]
Wang, G., Li, J., Li, Z., Wei, M., & Li, S. (2016). Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Brain research, 1639, 38-46.[link]
Wu, Y., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study. Biological psychology, 88(2-3), 253-262.[link]
Yamagishi, T., Li, Y., Fermin, A. S., Kanai, R., Takagishi, H., Matsumoto, Y., ... & Sakagami, M. (2017). Behavioural differences and neural substrates of altruistic and spiteful punishment. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-8.[link]
Yu, R., Hu, P., & Zhang, P. (2015). Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study. Scientific reports, 5, 13452.[link]
Zhong, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, E., Luo, J., & Chen, J. (2013). Individuals’ attentional bias toward an envied target's name: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience letters, 550, 109-114.[link]
Applied Psychology
Volume 16, Issue 3 - Serial Number 63
September 2022
Pages 91-73

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics