نقش واسطه‌ای رفتارهای سلامت در رابطة پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت و استفادة پرخطر و مشکل‌آفرین از اینترنت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

3 هیأت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

10.48308/apsy.2022.223335.1202

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف آزمون نقش واسطه­ای رفتارهای سلامت در رابطة ویژگی‌­های شخصیتی و رفتار استفادة پرخطر و مشکل­آفرین از اینترنت در دانشجویان انجام شد. روش: در این پژوهش همبستگی، 279 دانشجو (116 پسر و 163 دختر) که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند، به نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پنج عاملی بزرگ شخصیت (مک‌کری و کاستا، 1987)، نیمرخ سبک زندگی ارتقا دهندة سلامت ـ نسخة تجدید‌نظرشده دوم (والکر، سیچریست و پندر، 1995) و مقیاس غربالگری استفادة پرخطر و مشکل‌آفرین از اینترنت (جلینکینگ و همکاران، 2014) پاسخ دادند. به منظور آزمون روابط مفروض در مدل پیشنهادی از روش آماری مدل‌یابی معادله ساختاری استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که مدل واسطه­‌مندی نسبی رفتارهای ارتقا دهندة سبک زندگی سلامت‌محور در رابطة ویژگی­‌های شخصیتی و استفادة پرخطر و مشکل­آفرین از اینترنت با داده­‌ها برازش مطلوبی داشت. نتایج نشان داد که در مدل مفروض، تمامی وزن‌­های رگرسیونی از لحاظ آماری معنادار بودند و متغیرهای صفات شخصیت و رفتارهای سلامت، 42 درصد از واریانس نمرات رفتارهای استفادة پرخطر و مشکل‌آفرین از اینترنت را تبیین کردند. نتیجه‌گیری: در مجموع، نتایج مطالعة حاضر همسو با دیگر دغدغة تحرکات نظری و تجربی نشان داد که پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت از طریق تقویت و یا تضعیف منابع خودنظم‌بخشی مانند حالت‌های عاطفی، ادراکات از کنترل و جهت‌گیری‌های هدف‌مدارانه و متعاقب آن فراخوانی رفتارهای تسهیل‌گر/بازدارنده سبک زندگی سلامت‌محور، در پیش‌بینی رفتار استفادة پرخطر و مشکل‌آفرین از فناوری اینترنت در دانشجویان موثر واقع می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Mediating role of Health Behaviors on the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Problematic and Risky Internet Use

نویسندگان [English]

  • shirin moezzodini 1
  • Shahla pakdaman 2
  • omid shokri 3
1 Graduated from Master of Science in Psychology in Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associate Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
3 faculty of Shahid Beheshti university
چکیده [English]

Aim: The present study examined the mediating role of health behaviors on the relationship between big five personality traits and problematic and risky internet use among university students. Method: In this correlational study, 297 students (116 male and 163 female) who were selected by available sampling method, responded to the Five Factor Personality Traits Questionnaire (McCrae & Costa, 1987), the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (Walker, Sechrist & Pender, 1995) and The Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (Jelenchick & colleagues, 2014). Results: Results indicated that the partially mediated model of health behaviors on the relationship between personality traits and problematic and risky internet use had good fit to data. All of the regression weights in hypothesized model were statistically significant and the big five personality traits and health behavior variables accounted for 42% of the variance in problematic and risky internet use. Conclusion: Overall, the results of the present study in line with the other concerns of theoretical and experimental movements showed that the big five personality factors through strengthening or weakening sources of self-regulation such as affective states, perceptions of control and goal-based orientations and then elicitation health-promoting/inhibiting lifestyle behaviors, were effective in predicting the behavior of risky and problematic use of internet technology in students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Problematic And Risky Internet Use
  • Health Behaviors
  • Personality Traits

مراجع

شکری، ا. (1394). تحلیل عاملی تاییدی مقیاس غربالگری استفاده پرخطر و مشکل­آفرین از اینترنت. دوفصلنامة روان­شناسی بالینی و شخصیت، سال 22 (12)، 142-133.
عبدالله‌پور، م. آ.، شکری، ا.، تقی‌لو، ص.، طولابی، س.، فولادوند، خ. (1391). تغییرناپذیری جنسی روابط بین روان‌رنجورخویی، سبک‌های مقابله، تنشگرهای تحصیلی و واکنش به آنها با بهزیستی ذهنی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 6 (4)، 118-103.
محمدی، آ.، شکری، ا.، و سپاه منصور، م. (1397). رابطة بین رگه­های شخصیتی و فریبکاری تحصیلی: نقش واسطه­ای فرایندهای ارزیابی شناختی. فصلنامة اخلاق در علوم و فناوری. سال 13، (1)، 176-164.
یگانه، ن. (1401). روابط ساختاری پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت با نشانه‌های صفت شخصیتی دگرآزاری با میانجیگری شادنفرود در دانشجویان. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 16 (1)، 159-135.  
Ai, P., Liu, Y., & Zhao, X. (2019). Big five personality traits predict daily spatial behavior: Evidence from smartphone data. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 285–291.
Anderson, L. M. (2008). MySpace use as a potentially dysfunctional Internet behavior. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Texas: The University of Texas Department of Psychology.
Andreassen, C., Griffiths, M., Gjertsen, S., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2 (2), 90-99.
Arrivillaga, C., Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2020). Adolescents’ problematic internet and smartphone use is related to suicide ideation: Does emotional intelligence make a difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106-113.
Batigün, A. D., & Kiliç, N. (2011). The Relationships between Internet Addiction, Social Support, Psychological Symptoms and Some Socio-Demographical Variables. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67), 1-9.
Buckner, J. E. V., Castille, C. M., & Sheets, T. L. (2012). The five factor model of personality and employees’ excessive use of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1947e1953.
Buelow, M. T., & Cayton, C. (2020). Relationships between the big five personality characteristics and performance on behavioral decision making tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 101-109.
Bulut-Serin, N. (2011). An examination of predictor variables for problematic internet use. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 54e62.
Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 171–192.
Cao, F., & Su, L. (2006). Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: prevalence and psychological feature. Child Care Health and Development, 33, 275-281.
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704.
Conner, M. (2013). Health cognitions, affect and health behaviors. The European Health Psychologist, 15 (2), 33–39.
Chang, S., & Lin, S. S. J. (2019). Online gaming motive profiles in late adolescence and the related longitudinal development of stress, depression, and problematic internet use. Computers & Education, 135, 123-137.
Dieris-Hirche, J., Pape, M., Wildt, B. T., Kehyayan, A., & Bottel, L. (2020). Problematic gaming behavior and the personality traits of video gamers: A cross-sectional survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106-115.
Dong, Y., & Dumas, D. (2020). Are personality measures valid for different populations? A systematic review of measurement invariance across cultures, gender, and age. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109-115.
Durak, M., & Senol-Durak, E. (2014). Which personality traits are associated with cognitions related to problematic Internet use? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17 (3), 206e218.
Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2019). The Big-Five personality factors, mental health, and social-demographic indicators as independent predictors of gratification delay. Personality and Individual Differences, 150, 109-116.
Gallagher, D. J. (1996). Personality, coping, and objective outcomes: Extraversion, neuroticism, coping styles, and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 421-429.
Gonzalez, C. S., Gomez, N., Navarro, V., Cairos, V., Quirce, C., Toledo, P., & Marrero-Gordillo, N. (2016). Learning healthy lifestyles through active videogames, motor games and the gamification of educational activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 529-551.
Hwang, J. Y., Choi, J. S., Gwak, A. R., Jung, D., Choi, S. W., Lee, J., et al. (2014). Shared psychological characteristics that are linked to aggression between patients with Internet addiction and those with alcohol dependence. Annals of general psychiatry, 13 (1), 6-14.
Isler, L., Fletcher, G. J. O., Liu, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Validation of the four-profile configuration of personality types within the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 257–262.
Hamburger, Y. A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16 (4), 441-449.
Hardie, E., & Tee, M. Y. (2007). Excessive internet use: the role of the personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 1 (5), 34-47.
Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2018). Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 349-359.
Jelenchick, L. A., Eickhoff, J., Christakis, D. A. Brown, R. L., Zhang, C., Benson, M., Moreno, A. (2014). The Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS) for adolescents and young adults: Scale development and refinement. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 171–178.
Kayis, A. R., Satici, S. A., Yilmaz, M. F., Simsek, D., Ceyhan, E., & Bakioglu, F. (2016). Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 35-40.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford.
Kokkinos, C. M., & Saripanidis, L. (2017). A lifestyle exposure perspective of victimization through Facebook among university students. Do Individual Differences Matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 235-245.
Kuss, D. J., van Rooij, A. J., Shorter, G. W., Griffiths, M. D., & van de Mheen, D. (2013). Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1987-1996.
Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283–293.
Liu, Y.,Wang, Z. -H., & Li, Z. -G. (2012). Affective mediators of the influence of neuroticism and resilience on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 52 (7), 833–838.
Marques, A., Loureiro, N., Avelar-Rosa, B., Naia, A., de Matos, M. G. (2019). Adolescents’ healthy lifestyle. Journal of Pediatria, 96 (2), 217-224.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
McCann, S.J.H. (2011). Emotional health and the Big Five personality factors at the American state level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (4), 547–560.
McElroy, J. C., Hendrickson, A. R., Townsend, A. M., & DeMarie, S. M. (2007). Dispositional factors in internet use: personality versus cognitive style. MIS Quarterly, 13, 809-820.
Meyers, L. S., Gamest. G., & Goarin, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Thousand oaks. London. New Deihi, Sage publication.
Moreno, M. A., Eickhoff, J., Zhao, Q., Young, H. N., & Cox, E. D. (2019). Problematic internet use: A longitudinal study evaluating prevalence and predictors. The Journal of Pediatrics, 1, 100-107.
Neff, K.D., Rude, S.S., & Kirkpatrick, K.L. (2007). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41 (4), 908–916.
Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60.
Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K., Wood, C., & Williams, J. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424-435.
Petrides, K. V., Vernon, P.A., Schermer, J. A., Ligthart, L., Boomsma, D. I., & Veselka, L. (2010). Relationships between trait emotional intelligence and the Big Five in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 906–910.
Pettorruso, M., Valle, S., Cavic, E., Martinotti, G., Giannantonio, M., & Grant, J. E. (2020). Problematic Internet use (PIU), personality profiles and emotion dysregulation in a cohort of young adults: trajectories from risky behaviors to addiction. Psychiatry Research, 289, 113-120.
Pressman, S.D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971.
Puerta-Cort_es, D. X., & Carbonell, X. (2013). The model of the big five personality factors and problematic Internet use in Colombian youth. Adicciones, 26(1), 54-61.
Rahmani, S., & Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The relationship between internet dependency with sensation seeking and personality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 272-277.
Randler, C., Horzum, M. B., & Vollmer, C. (2014). Internet addiction and its relationship to chronotype and personality in a Turkish university student sample. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 484-485.
Sava, F. A., & Popa, R. I. (2011). Personality types based on the Big Five model: A cluster analysis over the Romanian population. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 359–384.
Servidio, R. (2014). Exploring the effects of demographic factors, Internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 85-92.
Sharpe, J.P., Martin, N.R., & Roth, K.A. (2011). Optimism and the Big Five factors of personality: Beyond neuroticism and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 946–951.
Sirois, F.M. (2014). Out of sight, out of time? Ameta-analytic investigation of procrastination and time perspective. European Journal of Personality, 28, 511–520.
Sirois, F.M. (2015a). A self-regulation resource model of self-compassion and health behavior intentions in emerging adults. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2, 218–222.
Sirois, F.M. (2015b). Perfectionism and health behaviors: A self-regulation resource perspective. In F.M. Sirois, & D.S. Molnar (Eds.), Perfectionism, health and well-being: Springer.
Sirois, F. M., & Hirsch, J. K. (2015). Big five traits, affect balance and health behaviors: A self-regulation resource perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 59–64.
Sirois, F. M., Kitner, R., & Hirsch, J. K. (2015). Self-compassion, affect, and health-promoting behaviors. Health Psychology, 34, 661–669.
Sirois, F.M., & Pychyl, T. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2), 115–127.
Spada, M. M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 3-6.
Stajkovic, A. D., Bandura, A., Locke, E. A., Lee, D., & Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta-analytic path-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 238–245.
Stead, H., & Bibby, P. A. (2017). Personality, fear of missing out and problematic internet use and their relationship to subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 534-540.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
Steptoe, A. (2010). Positive well-being and health. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 185–195). New York: Springer.
Tice, D.M., Baumeister, R.F., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 379–384.
Tsai, H. F., Cheng, S. H., Yeh, T. L., Shih, C. C., Chen, K. C., Yang, Y. C., et al. (2009). The risk factors of Internet addiction a survey of university freshmen. Psychiatry Research, 167(3), 294-299.
Tsitsika, A., Janikian, M., Greydanus, D. E., Omar, H. A., & Merrick, J. (2013). Internet addiction: A public health concern in adolescence. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: the role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(4), 391-398.
Van der Aa, N., Overbeek, G., Engels, R. C., Scholte, R. H., Meerkerk, G. J., & Van den Eijnden, R. J. (2009). Daily and compulsive internet use and well-being in adolescence: a diathesis-stress model based on big five personality traits. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38 (6), 765e776.
Wagner, D.D., & Heatherton, T.F. (2015). Self-regulation and its failure: The seven deadly threats to self-regulation. In M.Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 1: Attitudes and social cognition. APA handbooks in psychology (pp. 805–842). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1995). The health-promoting lifestyle profile II. Omaha: University of Nebraska Medical Center, College Of Nursing.
Weston, R., & Gore, Jr. P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5, 719-751.
Weinstein, A., & Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive Internet use. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36, 277-283.
Zhou, Y., Li, D., Jia, J., Li, X., Zhao, L., Sun, W., & Wang, Y. (2017). Interparental conflict and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of emotional insecurity and the moderating role of Big Five personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 470–478.
فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 29 فروردین 1401

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار