بررسی ویژگی های روانسنجی (روایی و پایایی) مقیاس شفقت خود: یافتن شواهد تجربی برای استفاده از نمره کل و تعریف مفهومی شفقت خود

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه آزاد گرمسار

2 دانشیار روانشناسی تربیتی گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار

3 استادیار جامعه شناسی گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار

چکیده

هدف: هدف از مطالعه حاضر افزون بر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان­سنجی (پایایی و روایی) مقیاس شفقت خود، پاسخ به دو انتقاد وارد شده به این مقیاس بود. روش: این پژوهش یک مطالعة توصیفی-تحلیلی از نوع اعتبارسنجی بود. نمونة این مطالعه شامل ۴۰۰ نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب بود که با روش نمونه­گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و مقیاس شفقت خود نف (2016 الف) را تکمیل کردند. یافته‌ها: نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی وجود شش عامل را نشان دادند که در مجموع ۲۴/۶۸ درصد از از واریانس کل مقیاس را تبیین کردند. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی افزون بر تأیید نتایج حاصل از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، تعریف مفهومی و استفاده از نمرة کل را مجاز برشمردند. ضریب پایایی کل پرسشنامه به روش آلفای کرونباخ ۷۷/۰ و به روش بازآزمایی ۷۵/۰ به دست آمد. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که مقیاس شفقت خود افزون بر داشتن ویژگی‌های روان­سنجی مناسب در گروه‌های غیربالینی، از نظر تعریف مفهومی سازه شفقت خود و استفاده از نمرة کل نیز معتبر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Psychometric Characteristics (Validity and Reliability) of the Self-Compassion Scale: Finding Empirical Evidence for Using the Total Score and defining the Concept of Self-Compassion

نویسندگان [English]

  • samira mohammadali 1
  • Davod Manavipour 2
  • Mojtaba Sedaghatifard 3
1 Islamic Azad university
2 Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch
3 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch
چکیده [English]

Aim:The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the Self-Compassion Scale, the response to the two critiques entered into this scale. Method: This research was a descriptive-analytic study of type validation. The sample consisted of 400 students from the Islamic Azad University of Tehran's South Branch who were selected by available sampling method and completed self-compassion scale. Results: The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed 6 factors, which in total, explained 68.28% of the total scale variance. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis, in addition to verifying the results of exploratory factor analysis, allowed the conceptual definition and use of the total score. The reliability coefficient of the scale was obtained by Cronbach's alpha of 0.77 and by a re-test method of 0.75. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that this scale, in addition to having proper psychometric properties in non-clinical groups, is also valid in terms of conceptual definition of self-compassion construct and use of total score.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • exploratory factor analysis
  • reliability
  • self-compassion
  • total score
Albertson, E. R., Neff, K. D., & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2015). Selfcompassion and body dissatisfaction in women: a randomized controlled trial of a brief meditation intervention. Mindfulness, 6: 444– 454. ]Link[
Arimitsu, K. (2014). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85: 50–59. ]Link[
Azizi, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Lotfi, S., & Bahramkhani, M. (2013). The validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the SelfCompassion Scale. Iranian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2: 17– 23. ]Link[
Barnes, B.A., & Kristeller, J.K. (2016). Impact of Mindfulness-Based Eating Awareness on Diet and Exercise Habits in Adolescents. International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine, 3(2): 00070. ]Link[
Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Evaluating the multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the Self-Compassion Scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9): 856–870. ]Link[
Chen, J., Yan, L., & Zhou, L. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19: 734–736. ]Link[
Cleare, S., Gumley, A., Cleare, C.J., O’Connor, R.C. (2018). An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness, 9: 618–628. ]Link[
Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2015). Alidation of the Psychometric Properties of the Self-Compassion Scale. Testing the Factorial Validity and Factorial Invariance of the Measure among Borderline Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Eating Disorder and General Populations. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Published online in Wiley Online Library.]Link[
Chalah, M.A., & Ayach, S.S. (2017). Alexithymia in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of literature. Neuropsychological, 104: 31-47. ]Link[
Deniz, M. E., Kesici, S., & Sumer, A. S. (2008). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 36: 1151–1160. ]Link[
Dundas, I., Svendsen, J. L., Wiker, A. S., Granli, K. V., & Schanche, E. (2016). Self-compassion and depressive symptoms in a Norwegian student sample. Nordic Psychology, 68(1): 58–72. ]Link[
Garcia-Campayo, J., Navarro-Gil, M., Andrés, E., Montero-Marin, J., López-Artal, L., & Marcos Piva Demarzo, M. (2014). Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12: 4. ]Link[
Giles, D.C. (2002). Advanced research method in psychology. London: Rutledge.
Halamová, J., Kanovský, M., & Pacúchová, M. (2018). Item-Response Theory Psychometric Analysis and Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism Scales. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 77: 137-147. ]Link[
Hupfeld, J., & Ruffieux, N. (2011). Validierung einer deutschen version der Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-D) (Validation of a German version of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-D)). Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapies, 40: 115–123. ]Link[
Kotsou, I., & Leys, C. (2016). Self-Compassion Scale (SCS): Psychometric Properties of The French Translation and Its Relations with Psychological Well-Being, Affect and Depression. PLoS ONE, 11(4): e0152880. ]Link[
Lee, W. K., & Lee, K. (2010). The validation study of the Korean version of the Self-Compassion Scale with adult women in the community. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 49: 193–200. ]Link[
Lopez, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s total score: self-compassion versus self-criticism. Plos one, 10(7): e0132940. ]Link[
Mantzios, M., Wilson, J. C., & Giannou, K. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Self-Compassion and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scales. Mindfulness, 6: 123–132. ]Link[
Mantzios, M., Wilson, J.C., & Giannou, K. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Greek Versions of the Self-Compassion and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scales. Mindfulness, Published online in Springer. ]Link[
Marie, B.J. (2016). Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Self-Compassion Scale: Using Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Models. A Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in General Psychology, University of North Florida. ]Link[
Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection or vulnerability? A metaanalysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. Advance online publication. ]Link[
Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 24(2), 373–383. ]Link[
Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection as the Mirror Image of Psychopathology: Further Critical Notes on the Self-Compassion. Mindfulness, Published Online. ]Link[
Neff, K. D. (2016a). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7: 264–274. ]Link[
Neff, K. D. (2016b). Does Self-Compassion Entail Reduced Self-Judgment, Isolation, and Over-Identification? A Response to Muris, Otgaar,and Petrocchi (2016). Mindfulness, 7: 791–797. ]Link[
Neff, K. D., & Faso, D. J. (2015). Self-compassion and well-being in parents of children with autism. Mindfulness, 6:938–947. ]Link[
Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L.M., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., & et al. (2018). Examining the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication. ]Link[
Neff, K. D., Whittaker, T., & Karl, A. (2017). Examining the factor structure of the selfcompassion scale in four distinct populations: Is the use of a total scale score justified. Journal of Personality Assessment. ]Link[
Neff, K.D. (2015). The Self-Compassion Scale is a Valid and Theoretically Coherent Measure of Self-Compassion. Mindfulness, Published online in Springer. ]Link[
Neff, K.D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77: 23–50.
Ozdemir, B., & Seef, N. (2017). Examining the Factors of Self-Compassion Scale with Canonical Commonality Analysis: Syrian Sample. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 70: 19–36. ]Link[
Petrocchi, N., Ottaviani, C., & Couyoumdjian, A. (2014). Dimensionality of self-compassion: translation and construct validation of the selfcompassion scale in an Italian sample. Journal of Mental Health, 23: 72–77. ]Link[
Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the Self-Compassion Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26: 407–418. ]Link[