فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

ویژگی­‌های روانسنجی نسخه 20 سوالی پرسشنامه باورهای وسواسی در زنان ساکن شهر تهران

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
کیمیا تیموری 1
محسن کچویی 2
مرضیه گرجی 1
مالک بسطامی 3
کیمیا نجفی 4
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی خانواده، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار روانشناسی سلامت، گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران
4 دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی بالینی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ایران
10.48308/apsy.2026.244439.2025
چکیده
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی ویژگی‌های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه باورهای وسواسی (نسخه 20 سوالی) انجام شد.
روش: جامعه آماری این پژوهش، زنان ساکن شهر تهران بود. حجم نمونه تعداد 843 نفر بود که به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب گردید. ابزارهای گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسشنامه باورهای وسواسی (OBQ-20؛ مالدینگ، 2011)، پرسشنامه وسواسی جبری مادزلی (MOCI؛ هاجسون، 1977)، پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود (SAM؛ بار، 2007) و مقیاس نگرش به مسئولیت (RAS؛ سالکووسکیس و همکاران، 2000) بود. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آمار توصیفی و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی (CFA) به منظور بررسی روایی سازه، همبستگی پیرسون برای ارزیابی روایی همگرا و آلفای کرونباخ و بازآزمایی جهت سنجش پایایی ابزار استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد که مدل چهارعاملی ابزار از برازش مطلوب برخوردار است (RMSEA=0.067، SRMR=0.055، CFI=0.906). ضرایب همبستگی معنادار بین نمره کل ابزار و مؤلفه‌های آن با مقیاس‌های علائم وسواسی-جبری مادزلی، دوسوگرایی به خود و نگرش به مسئولیت، روایی همگرای مطلوبی را نشان دادند (r=0.52 تا r=0.76، p<0.01). همچنین پایایی ابزار با روش آلفای کرونباخ 0.92 برای نمره کل و دامنه بین 0.75 تا 0.84 برای مؤلفه‌ها و بازآزمایی 0.79 تأیید شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نسخه 20 سوالی پرسشنامه باورهای وسواسی دارای روایی و پایایی مطلوب است. بر این اساس، می‌توان از آن به‌عنوان ابزاری معتبر برای سنجش باورهای وسواسی در جمعیت زنان ساکن شهر تهران استفاده کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اختلال وسواسی جبری
باورهای وسواسی
ویژگی‌های روانسنجی

عنوان مقاله English

Psychometric Properties of the 20-item Version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire in women residing in Tehran

نویسندگان English

Kimiya Teymoori 1
Mohsen Kachooei 2
Marzieh Gorji 1
Malek Bastami 3
Kimia Najafi 4
1 MSc student in clinical family psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
4 PhD student of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Aim: The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire–20 item version (OBQ-20).
Method: The statistical population consisted of women residing in Tehran. A total of 843 participants were selected through convenience sampling. The data collection instruments included the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ-20; Moulding, 2011), the Maudsley Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (MOCI; Hodgson, 1977), the Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM; Bhar, 2007), and the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS; Salkovskis, 2000). Descriptive statistics and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate convergent validity, and Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest methods were employed to assess reliability.
Results: The results of CFA supported the four-factor model with acceptable fit indices (RMSEA=0.067, SRMR=0.055, CFI=0.906). Significant correlations between the total and subscale scores of the OBQ-20 and the related scales (MOCI, SAM, and RAS) indicated good convergent validity (r=0.52 to r=0.76, p<0.01). The questionnaire also demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92 for the total score, 0.75 to 0.84 for the subscales, and a test-retest coefficient of 0.79.
Conclusion: The 20-item version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire showed satisfactory validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be considered a valid tool for assessing obsessive beliefs in women residing in Tehran.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Obsessive Beliefs
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Psychometric Properties
Ameri, N., & Najafi, M. (2022). The Mediating Role of Psychological Distress in the Relationship between Experiential Avoidance and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms. Psychological Studies, 17(4), 11-31. [In Persian] [Link]
Bhar, S. S., & Kyrios, M. (2007). An investigation of self‐ambivalence in obsessive‐compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 45, 1845–1857. [Link]
Boland, R., Verduin, M. L.. (2024). Kaplan & Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. [Link]
Burns, G. L., Formea, G. M., Keortge, S., & Sternberger, L. G. (1995). The utilization of nonpatient samples in the study of obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(2), 133-144. [Link]
Cervin, M., McNeel, M. M., Wilhelm, S., McGuire, J. F., Murphy, T. K., Small, B. J., Geller, D. A., & Storch, E. A. (2022). Cognitive Beliefs Across the Symptom Dimensions of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Type of Symptom Matters. Behavior therapy, 53(2), 240–254. [Link]
Dadfar, M.. (1997). Investigating the comorbidity of personality disorders in obsessive-compulsive patients and comparing them with normal individuals. Master's thesis in clinical psychology. Tehran Psychiatric Institute. [in persian]
Dadfarnia, SH., & Mosavian, E.. (2020). The Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Self-Ambivalence Measure about Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(3 (47) ), 35-46. [in persian] [Link]
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications. [Link]
Fawcett, E. J., Power, H., & Fawcett, J. M. (2020). Women are at greater risk of OCD than men: a meta-analytic review of OCD prevalence worldwide. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 81(4), 19r13085-19r13085. [Link]
Fergus, T. A., & Carmin, C. N. (2014). The validity and specificity of the short-form of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 318-328. [Link]
Fergus, T. A., Latendresse, S. J., & Wu, K. D. (2019). Factor structure and further validation of the 20-item Short Form of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire. Assessment, 26(6), 984-1000.‏ [Link]
Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002). The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development and validation of a short version. Psychological assessment, 14(4), 485. [Link]
Frost, R. O., & Steketee, G. (Eds.). (2002). Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Elsevier.‏   [Link]
Gagné, J.-P., Van Kirk, N., Hernandez-Vallant, A., Potluri, S., Krompinger, J. W., Cattie, J. E., Garner, L. E., Crosby, J. M., Brennan, B. P., & Elias, J. A. (2018). Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-9 (OBQ-9) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. [Link]
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Delgado, P., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989). The yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale: II. Validity. Journal of Archives of general psychiatry, 46(11), 1012-1016. [Link]
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R. L., Hill, C. L., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989). The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of general psychiatry, 46(11), 1006-1011. [Link]
Hawley, L. L., Rector, N. A., & Richter, M. A. (2021). Technology supported mindfulness for obsessive compulsive disorder: The role of obsessive beliefs. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 81, 102405. [Link]
 Hellberg, S. N., Buchholz, J. L., Twohig, M. P., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2020). Not just thinking, but believing: Obsessive beliefs and domains of cognitive fusion in the prediction of OCD symptom dimensions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(1), 69-78.[Link]
Hodgson, R. J., & Rachman, S. (1977). Obsessional-compulsive complaints. Behaviour research and therapy, 15(5), 389-395.[Link]
Inozu, M., Keser, E., Erel, S., Sari, B. A., Haciömeroğlu, A. B., & Özmenler, K. N. (2022). The investigation of transdiagnostic role of obsessive beliefs: comparison of clinical groups diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorders and depression with university students. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 33(1), 22.  [Link]
Kabirnejad, S., Mahmoud Alilu, M., & Sharifi, M.. (2010). Validity and reliability of the responsibility attitude scale (RAS). Psychological Research, 25(13), 109-123. [in persian] [Link]
Kalanthroff, E., & Wheaton, M. G. (2022). An integrative model for understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: merging cognitive behavioral theory with insights from clinical neuroscience. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(24), 7379. [Link]
Keshavarz ashar, H., Barabari, A., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2017). The Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Padua Inventory in Nonclinical Population of Iran. Journal of Police Medicine, 6(2), 117-125. [In Persian]  [Link]
Kim, S. K., McKay, D., & Tolin, D. F. (2022). Examining the generality and specificity of gender moderation in obsessive compulsive beliefs: Stacked prediction by correspondence analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 613-628. [Link]
Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling .3nd Ed. New York: Guilford. [Link]
Miegel, F., Daubmann, A., Moritz, S., Balzar, A., Yassari, A. H., & Jelinek, L. (2023). Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Dimensions and Their Relationships with Obsessive Beliefs: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. The Psychiatric quarterly, 94(3), 345–360. [Link]
Miegel, F., Jelinek, L., & Moritz, S. (2019). Dysfunctional beliefs in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression as assessed with the Beliefs Questionnaire (BQ). Psychiatry Research, 272, 265-274.[Link]
Moulding, R., Anglim, J., Nedeljkovic, M., Doron, G., Kyrios, M., & Ayalon, A. (2011). The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ): Examination in nonclinical samples and development of a short version. Assessment, 18(3), 357-374. [Link]
Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (1997). Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(7), 667-681. [Link]
Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2003). Psychometric validation of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire and the interpretation of intrusions inventory: Part I. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(8), 863-878. [Link]
Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory—Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(11), 1527-1542. [Link]
Pablo, C., Manão, A. A., Salvador, M. D. C., & Moura-Ramos, M. (2025). The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire – short form (OBQ-20): psychometric properties and validation to European Portuguese. Poster session presented at XII Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia, Porto, Portugal. [Link]
Pourebrahimi, M., Sarafraz, M., Hadianfard, H., & Mohammadi, N. (2024). Harm avoidance and incompleteness core motivations in obsessive-compulsive disorder: validation of the Farsi version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (F-OC-TCDQ) in Iran. BMC psychology, 12(1), 552. [Link]
Rachman, S. (1998). A cognitive theory of obsessions: Elaborations. Behaviour research and therapy, 36(4), 385-401.‏ [Link]
Rajezi Esfahani, S., Motaghipour, Y., Kamkari, K., Zahiredin, A., & Janbozorgi, M. (2012). Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 17(4), 297-303. [In Persian] [Link]
Sahin, B., Safak, Y., & Ozdel, K. (2023). The relationship between symptom dimensions and cognitive features in obsessive compulsive disorder. Current Psychology, 42(16), 13288-13300. [Link]
Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour research and therapy, 23(5), 571-583. ‏[Link]
Salkovskis, P. M., Wroe, A. L., Gledhill, A., Morrison, N., Forrester, E., Richards, C., Reynolds, M., & Thorpe, S. (2000). Responsibility attitude and interpretations are characteristics of obsessive and compulsive disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 347-372. [Link]
Shams, G., Karam Ghadiri, N., Esmaili Torkanbouri, Y., & Ebrahim Khani, N.. (2004). Validation and reliability of the Persian version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire – 44. Advances in Cognitive Science. 6 (1 and 2), 23-36. [in persian] [Link]
Sinha, R., Mahour, P., Sharma, E., Mehta, U. M., & Agarwal, M. (2021). Obsessive belief and emotional appraisal correlates of symptom dimensions and impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Indian journal of psychiatry, 63(4), 348–354. [Link]
Tantrarungroj, T., Saipanish, R., Lotrakul, M., & Wisajun, P. (2024). Psychometric Properties of Thai Version of Obsessive Belief Questionnaire (OBQ-T). Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 107(3), 152-159. [Link]
the American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. United States. [Link]
Torresan, R. C., Ramos-Cerqueira, A. T. A., Shavitt, R. G., do Rosário, M. C., de Mathis, M. A., Miguel, E. C., & Torres, A. R. (2013). Symptom dimensions, clinical course and comorbidity in men and women with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry research, 209(2), 186-195. [Link]
Wu, K. D., & Carter, S. A. (2008). Further investigation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire: Factor structure and specificity of relations with OCD symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(5), 824-836. [Link]
Yorulmaz, O., Güngör, D., & Gökdağ, C. (2019). The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire: Adaptation of Its Short Forms to the Turkish and Examination of Their Psychometric Properties. Turkish journal of psychiatry, 30(3), 191–199. [Link]
فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 04 مهر 1405