فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

ویژگی‌های روان سنجی مقیاس بهزیستی مسیرشغلی در کارکنان ایرانی

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
الهه صادقی
فاطمه سمیعی
محمدرضا عابدی
گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
10.48308/apsy.2026.245469.2059
چکیده
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس بهزیستی مسیرشغلی کوئتزی و همکاران (۲۰۲۰) انجام شد.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کارکنان دانشگاه در شهر اصفهان در سال ۱۴۰۴ بود. از این میان، تعداد ۳۶۰ نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل مقیاس بهزیستی مسیرشغلی کوئتزی و همکاران (۲۰۲۰)، مقیاس بهزیستی شغلی شولتز (۲۰۰۸) و سیاهه فرسودگی شغلی مسلش و جکسون (۱۹۸۱) بود. داده‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، ضریب همبستگی، آلفای کرونباخ، ضریب امگا مک‌دونالد و شاخص پایایی ترکیبی و بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزارهای تخصصی SPSS-26 و Mplus 8.3 تحلیل شد. روایی همگرا و روایی واگرای مقیاس با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌های بهزیستی شغلی و فرسودگی شغلی محاسبه شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد مدل سه‌عاملی مرتبه اول که شامل عاطفه مثبت شغلی، معنا‌داری شغلی و شبکه‌سازی شغلی/حمایت اجتماعی است و مدل تک عاملی مرتبه دوم از برازش مطلوبی برخوردار هستند. مقادیر آلفای کرونباخ بهزیستی مسیرشغلی، عاطفه مثبت شغلی، معنا‌داری شغلی و شبکه‌سازی شغلی/حمایت اجتماعی به ترتیب ۹۲/۰، ۸۷/۰، ۸۲/۰ و ۸۴/۰ و مقادیر امگا مک دونالد به ترتیب ۸۸/۰، ۸۷/۰، ۸۳/۰ و ۸۴/۰ به دست آمد.
نتیجه‌گیری: درمجموع، یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که مقیاس بهزیستی مسیرشغلی برای کارکنان از ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی قابل‌قبولی برخوردار است. بنابراین، مشاوران و سازمان‌ها می‌توانند از این ابزار در مطالعات مرتبط با بهزیستی مسیرشغلی، استفاده کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تحلیل عاملی تأییدی
ساختار عاملی
بهزیستی مسیرشغلی
ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Psychometric Properties of the Career Well-Being Scale in Iranian Employees

نویسندگان English

Elahe Sadeghi
fatemeh samiee
Mohammad Reza Abedi
Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education & Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of Coetzee et al.'s (2020) Career Well-Being Scale.
Method: The present research employed a descriptive correlational method. The statistical population comprised university employees in the city of Isfahan in 2025. From this population, 360 individuals were selected using a random sampling method. Research instruments included Coetzee et al.'s (2020) Career Well-Being Scale, Schultz's (2008) Occupational Well-being Scale, and Maslach and Jackson's (1981) Burnout Inventory. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega coefficient, and composite reliability index, employing the specialized software SPSS-26 and Mplus 8.3. Convergent and divergent validity of the scale were calculated using the Occupational Well-being and Burnout Inventories.
Conclusion: The results indicated that the three- first-order factor model, which positive affective career, career meaningfulness, and career networking/social support, and the first-factor second-order model demonstrated good fit. The Cronbach's alpha values for career well-being, positive affective career state, career meaningfulness, and career networking/social support were 0.92, 0.87, 0.82, and 0.84, respectively, and McDonald's Omega values were 0.88, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.84, respectively.
Results: In sum, the research findings indicated that the Career Well-Being Scale possesses acceptable psychometric properties for employees. Therefore, counselors and organizations can utilize this instrument in studies related to career well-being.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Factor Structure
Career Well-Being
Psychometric Properties
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. [Link]
Coetzee, M. (2021). Career wellbeing and career agility as coping attributes in the modern career space. In Agile Coping in the Digital Workplace: Emerging Issues for Research and Practice (pp. 35-51). Springer International Publishing. [Link]
Coetzee, M. (2021). Psychological states of career wellbeing and affective commitment as predictors of dual career agility types. African Journal of Career Development, 3(1), a47. [Link]
Coetzee, M., Ferreira, N., & Potgieter, I. L. (2021). Exploring the construct validity of the Career Well-being Scale for its potential application as a career development tool in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic career space. African Journal of Career Development, 3(1), a39. [Link]
Coetzee, M., Bester, M. S., Ferreira, N., & Potgieter, H. (2020). Facets of career agility as explanatory mechanisms of employees’ career adaptability. African Journal of Career Development, 2(1), a11. [Link]
Coetzee, M., & Schreuder, A. M. G. (2021). Careers: An organisational perspective (6th ed.). Juta. [Link]
Elsamani, Y., Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2023). Employee well-being and innovativeness: A multi-level conceptual framework based on citation network analysis and data mining techniques. PLOS ONE, 18(1), Article e0280005. [Link]
Eslami, A., Kouti, L., Javadi, M. R., Assarian, M., & Eslami, K. (2015). An investigation of job stress and job burnout in Iranian clinical pharmacist. Journal of Pharmaceutical Care, 21-25. [Link]
Espanani, M., Abedi, M. R., & Nilfrooshan, P. (2022). Compare the effects of career counseling method based on Holland’s theory, social cognitive career theory, and solution-focused counseling on career well-being of high school students in Isfahan city. Journal of Counseling Research, 21(84), 22-61. [Link]
Evarist, A. (2018). Adolescent trauma and psychosocial wellbeing in Entebbe-Uganda. Universal Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 67–79. [Link]
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Link]
Jiang, Z. (2017). Social support and career psychological states: An integrative model of person-environment fit. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(2), 219–237. [Link]
Johnson, S., Robertson, I. T., & Cooper, C. L. (2018). Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.  [Link]
Kaabomeir, N., & Naami, A. (2016). The effect of perceived organizational justice on organizational loyalty and job well-being with mediating role of social undermining and moderating role of job control in employees of Ahwaz Golestan Hospital. Nursing Education, 5(3), 35–63. [Link]
Kinder, A., Hughes, R., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2023). Occupational health and wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities in theory and practice. Routledge. [Link]
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. [Link]
Koon, V. Y., & Ho, T. S. (2021). Authentic leadership and employee engagement: The role of employee well-being. Human Systems Management, 40(1), 81–92. [Link]
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. [Link]
Leutner, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2018). Stronger together: Personality, intelligence and the assessment of career potential. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4) ,49. [Link]
Lomax, R.G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Link]
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99-113. [Link]
May, E. (2022). The great resignation is here: What does that mean for developers? Stack Overflow Blog. [Link]
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. [Link]
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. [Link]
Naami, A., & Piryaei, S. (2013). The role of subjective occupational success in prediction of occupational well-being in employees of an industrial company. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 315–320. [Link]
Parker, G. B., & Hyett, M. P. (2011). Measurement of well-being in the workplace: The development of the work well-being questionnaire. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 394-397. [Link]
Robertson, I. T., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M., & Curran, T. (2024). Resilience, wellbeing and work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(1), 1–23. [Link]
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. [Link]
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press. [Link]
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. [Link]
Shultz, M. (2008). Occupational well-being: The development of a measure. Kansas State University. [Link]
Stefana, A., Damiani, S., Granziol, U., Provenzani, U., Solmi, M., Youngstrom, E. A., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2025). Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1494261. [Link]
Tokdemir, G. (2022). Software professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: Factors affecting their mental well-being and work engagement in the home-based work setting. Journal of Systems and Software, 188, 111286. [Link]
Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursing research: Design statistics and computer analysis. F. a. Davis.  [Link]
Weziak-Bialowolska, D., Bialowolski, P., Sacco, P. L., VanderWeele, T. J., & McNeely, E. (2020). Well-being in life and well-being at work: Which comes first? Evidence from a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, Article 103. [Link]
Wilhelm, F., & Hirschi, A. (2019). Career self-management as a key factor for career wellbeing. In I. L. Potgieter, N. Ferreira, & M. Coetzee (Eds.), Theory, research and dynamics of career wellbeing: Becoming fit for the future, 117-137. [Link]
Yeşiltaş, M. D. (2025). Turkish adaptation of Career Well-Being Scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Business and Economics Research Journal, 16(1), 69–86. [Link]
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. H. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621–644. [Link]
فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 16 آبان 1405