تحلیل روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه سبک اسنادی در دانشجویان ایرانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی تربیتی

3 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مهاباد

4 استادیار دانشگاه یاسوج

چکیده

چکیدههدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین ویژگی­های روان­سنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی در دانشجویان ایرانی انجام شد. روش: روش پژوهش همبستگی و جامعه آماری 6000 دانشجوی مجتمع ولیعصر دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز بود که از میان آن­ها 270 دانشجوی کارشناسی به تعداد 93 پسر و 177 دختر با روش نمونه­گیری چندمرحله­ای انتخاب و پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی پیترسون، سیمل، بی­یر، آبرامسون، متالسکی و سلیگمن، (1982) و پرسشنامة هیجان­های پیشرفت پکران، گوئتز و پری، 2005 در مورد آن­ها اجرا شد. یافته­ها: نتایج حاصل از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی نشان داد ساختار عاملی پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی برای موقعیت­های مثبت و منفی شامل سه بُعد درونی/ بیرونی، پایدار/ ناپایدار و فراگیر/ ویژه است. افزون بر این، همبستگی مثبت اسنادهای علّی مثبت با هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت، در مقابل رابطة منفی اسنادهای علّی مثبت با هیجان­های پیشرفت منفی، و همبستگی مثبت اسنادهای علّی منفی با هیجان­های پیشرفت منفی، در مقابل همبستگی منفی بین اسنادهای علّی منفی با هیجان­های مثبت، حاکی از روایی همگرای پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی و مقادیر ضرایب همسانی درونی ابعاد مختلف اسنادهای علّی مثبت و منفی در پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی قابل قبول بود. نتیجه‌گیری: در مجموع، نتایج مطالعة حاضر نشان داد پرسشنامة سبک اسنادی برای سنجش مفهوم اسنادهای علّی در دانشجویان ایرانی ابزاری روا و پایا است و در پژوهش­های روان­شناحتی می­توان از آن استفاده کرد کلیدواژه­ها: تحلیل عاملی تاییدی، سبک اسنادی، روایی عاملی، ویژگی­های روان­سنجی.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric analysis of the Farsi version of the attribution style questionnaire among Iranian university students

چکیده [English]

Abstract
Aim: Purpose of study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the attribution style questionnaire among Iranian university students. Methods: In this correlational study, 270 students (93 male, 177 female) were selected from among 6000 university students from the Islamic Azad University (Central Tehran branches). Selection was made using multistage sampling and participants completed attribution style questionnaire Peterson, Semel, Beayer, Abramson, Metalsky & Seligman (1982) and achievement emotions questionnaire Pekrun, Goetz & Perry, 2005. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compute the attribution style questionnaire's factorial validity. Results: Results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a three factor structure consisting of the internal/external, stable/unstable and specific/universal dimensions for positive and negative situations. A positive correlation between adaptive causal attributions with positive achievement emotions and a negative correlation between non-adaptive causal attributions with negative achievement emotions provided first hand evidence of the attribution Style questionnaire's convergent validity. Internal consistency for the scales of the attribution style questionnaire was acceptable. Conclusion: In sum, these findings provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the attribution style questionnaire as an instrument to measure causal attributions among Iranian university students.

Key Words: attributional style, confirmatory factor, factorial validity, psychometric properties

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • attributional style
  • confirmatory factor
  • factorial validity
  • Psychometric properties

مراجع

  1. منصوری، الهام.، شکری، امید.، پورشهریار، حسین.، پوراعتماد، حمید رضا. و رحیمی‌نژاد، پیمان. (1393). اثربخشی برنامة تاب‌آوری پنسیلوانیا بر سبک‌های اسنادی و سازگاری روان‌شناختی دانشجویان. فصلنامة روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 8 (2 پیاپی 30)، 144-129.
  2. Arntz, A., Gerlsma, C., & Albersnagel, F. A. (1985). Attributional style questioned: Psychometric evaluation of the ASQ in Dutch adolescents. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 55–89.
  3. Asner-Self, K. K., & Schreiber, J. B. (2004). A factor analytic study of the attributional style questionnaire with Central American immigrants. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37 (3): 144-153.
  4. Basturk, S., & Yavuz, L. (2010). Investigating causal attributions of success and failure on mathematics instructions of students in Turkish high schools. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2): 1940-1943.
  5. Butler, R. (2014). Motivation in Educational Contexts: Does Gender Matter? Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 47, 1-41.
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Cox, C. B., & Yang, Y. (2012). Getting off on the wrong foot: Longitudinal effects of Hispanic students' stability attributions following poor initial test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 22 (1): 123-127.
  8. Erten, L. H., & Burden, R. L. (2014). The relationship between academic self-concept, attributions, and L2 achievement. System, 42, 391-401.
  9. Espie, C. A., Kyle, S. D., Miller, C. B., Ong, J., Hames, P., & Fleming, L. (2014). Attribution, cognition and psychopathology in persistent insomnia disorder: outcome and mediation analysis from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy. Sleep Medicine, 15 (8): 913-917.
  10. Fishman, E. J. (2014). Toward a theory of the perceived control of the attribution process. Educational Research Review, 13, 1-16.
  11. Torrecillas, F. L., Arcos, F.A., & Garcia, A. P. (2005). Effects of executive impairments on maladaptive explanatory styles in substance abusers: clinical implications. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20 (1), 67–80.
  12. Gholamali Lavasani, M., Sadat Sharifian, M., Naghizadeh, S., & Hematirad, G. (2012). The Effect of Attribution Retraining on Academic Achievement. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5845-5848.
  13. Haeffel, G. J., Gibb, B. E., Metalsky, G. I., Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hankin, B. L., Joiner, T. E., & Swendsen, J D. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 824–836.
  14. Hawi, N. (2010). Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate students in an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers & Education, 54 (4): 1127-1136.
  15. Helfritz-Sinville, L. E., & Stanford, M. S. (2014). Hostile attribution bias in impulsive and premeditated aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 45-50.
  16. Hewitt, A. K., Foxcroft, D. R., & MacDonald, J. (2004). Multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis of the attributional style questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1483–1491.
  17. Higgins, N. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hay, J. L. (1999). Construct validity of attributional style: Modeling context-dependent item sets in the attributional style questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 804–820.
  18. Hsieh, P. H. P., & Schallert, D. L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (4): 513-532.
  19. Hu L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  20. Human-Vogel, S., & Petegem, P. (2008). Causal judgments of positive mood in relation to self-regulation: A case study with Flemish students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (4): 451-485.
  21. Kauppi, T., & Porhola, M. (2012). School teachers bullied by their students: Teachers' attributions and how they share their experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28 (7): 1059-1068.
  22. King, C. L. (2002). A psychometric analysis of the negative scale of the attributional style questionnaire with an eye towards investigating gender differences: subtitle a comparison of methods.
  23. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of Structural Equation modeling (2nd edition). New York: Guilford.
  24. Lewis, S. P. Waschbusch, D. A., Powers, S. D., Monique, L., & Lou, k. M. (2014). Factor structure of the Children’s Attributional Style Questionnaire–Revised. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 46(2): 125-133.
  25. Liu C., & Bates, T. C. (2014). The structure of attributional style: Cognitive styles and optimism–pessimism bias in the Attributional Style Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 79–85.
  26. MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Lindsey, E. W., Frabutt, J. M., & Chambers, J. C. (2014). Mother–adolescent conflict in African American and European American families: The role of corporal punishment, adolescent aggression, and adolescents' hostile attributions of mothers' intent. Journal of Adolescence, 37 (6): 851-861.
  27. McClure, J., Meyer, L. H., Garisch, J., Fischer, R., Weir, K. F., & Walkey, F. H. (2011). Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36 (2): 71-81.
  28. Meins, E., McCarthy-Jones, S., Fernyhough, C., Lewis, G., Bentall, R. P., & Alloy, L. B. (2012). Assessing negative cognitive style: Development and validation of a Short-Form version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 581–585.
  29. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publication. Thousand Oaks. London. New Dehi.
  30. Pearson, R. M., Heron, J., Button, K., Bentall, R. P., Fernyhough, C., Mahedy, L., Bowes, L., & Lewis, G. (2015). Cognitive styles and future depressed mood in early adulthood: The importance of global attributions. Journal of Affective Disorders, 171(15): 60-67.
  31. Pekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15, 497–506.
  32. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
  33. Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotions at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 575–604). New York: Routledge.
  34. Pekran, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (3): 383-397.
  35. Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Compass, 4, 238–255.
  36. Peterson, C., Semel. A., Von Beayer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attribution style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 229- 286.
  37. Steinhardt, M. A., & Dolbier, C. L. (2008). Evaluation of a resilience intervention to enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease symptomatology. Journal of American College Health, 56 (4): 445-453.
  38. Soric, L., & Palekcic, M. (2009). The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 545-565.
  39. Stupnisky, R. H., Stewart, T. L., Daniels, L. M., & Perry, R. P. (2011). When do students ask why? Examining the precursors and outcomes of causal search among first-year college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36 (3): 201-211.
  40. Weiner, B. (2008). An Attribution Theorist Addresses the Co-existence of Theoretical Generality and Cultural Specificity. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition across Cultures, 143-160.
  41. Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist. 34 (5): 719-751.
  42. Woodcock, S., & Jiang, H. (2013). Teachers' causal attributional responses of students with learning disabilities in China. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 163-170.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار